+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 49.6k Manitoba voters.

33%
Yes
67%
No
14%
Yes
65%
No
14%
Yes, but only by court order
2%
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
3%
Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds
2%
Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 49.6k Manitoba voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 49.6k Manitoba voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Manitoba voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9SXNRYKfrom California  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, so long as the country maintains a strong rule of law. As long as your right to free speech is protected, you do not need privacy in my opinion.

 @9QZCYDNfrom Ontario  answered…9mos9MO

Only if they have reasonable cause to believe somebody needs to be monitored, like if they're a criminal or there's police evidence. In addition there needs to be a court order to give permission.

 @9LTNCX4from Ontario  answered…12mos12MO

No, unless the person is a registered offender or someone else that must be kept tabs on for safety reasons.

 @9L2P5YGfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Depends. If the person is under government radar for illegal activities, then yes. But if the person is off radar or reformed and is completely fine, even with criminal background, then should be occasionally monitored but not strictly.

 @9JC6BKVfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, and all communications for any elected official should be public record before ANY private citizens are subjected to monitoring excepted by court order.

 @9GNXSP7from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

No, only in cases where a warrant is needed and deemed necessary for extreme crime and terrorist activities.

 @9FCQFGMfrom Quebec  answered…2yrs2Y