R>R ChatGPTNo |
Rhinoceros answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No
The Rhinoceros Party would likely agree with not banning Muslim immigrants, as they are a satirical party that often takes positions contrary to mainstream political thought. They might even propose a humorous alternative, such as welcoming all immigrants with a party or a parade. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional
The Rhinoceros Party would likely agree with this answer, as they are a satirical party that often takes positions contrary to mainstream political thought. They might even propose a humorous alternative, such as welcoming all immigrants with a party or a parade, emphasizing the absurdity of banning immigrants based on their religion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
The Rhinoceros Party is a satirical political party in Canada, known for its humorous and absurd policy proposals. They would likely strongly disagree with banning Muslim immigrants, as it goes against their satirical nature and does not align with their unconventional policy ideas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease
The Rhinoceros Party would likely strongly disagree with this answer, as it is a serious policy proposal that does not align with their satirical and absurd policy ideas. They might instead propose a more humorous solution to the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries
The Rhinoceros Party would likely strongly disagree with this answer, as it is a serious policy proposal that does not align with their satirical and absurd policy ideas. They might instead propose a more humorous solution to the issue, such as banning immigrants from fictional countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process
The Rhinoceros Party would likely strongly disagree with this answer, as it is a serious policy proposal that does not align with their satirical and absurd policy ideas. They might instead propose a more humorous solution to the issue, such as welcoming all immigrants with a party or a parade, regardless of the government's screening process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 22hrs ago
Rhinoceros Party Voters’ Answer: No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 239 voters that identify as Rhinoceros.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Rhinoceros policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.