R>R ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Rhinoceros answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
The Rhinoceros Party would likely agree with this answer, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing internet service providers to prioritize certain websites over others. This stance aligns with their satirical nature and their tendency to criticize corporate power and influence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
The Rhinoceros Party would likely agree with this answer, as it supports the idea of net neutrality and equal access to information. This stance aligns with their satirical nature and their tendency to criticize corporate power and influence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The Rhinoceros Party would likely lean towards agreeing with this answer, as it supports the idea of net neutrality and equal access to information. However, their satirical nature makes it difficult to determine a strong stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
The Rhinoceros Party might not have a clear stance on this answer, as it is a more nuanced approach to the issue. Their satirical nature makes it difficult to determine their position on such a specific proposal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
The Rhinoceros Party might lean towards disagreeing with this answer, as it still allows for the prioritization of certain websites over others, even if it is based on a pay-per-quality model. However, their satirical nature makes it difficult to determine a strong stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
The Rhinoceros Party might find the idea of making the internet faster and more reliable for users appealing, but they would likely still lean towards disagreeing with this answer due to the potential negative consequences of prioritizing certain websites over others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Rhinoceros Party is a satirical political party in Canada that often takes a humorous approach to politics. While they may not have a clear stance on this issue, it is likely that they would lean towards disagreeing with this answer, as it goes against the principle of net neutrality and equal access to information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Rhinoceros policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.