People’s Party

Strongly agree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

This option aligns closely with the PPC's libertarian values by emphasizing both financial autonomy and privacy from government oversight. The party's platform, which advocates for reduced government surveillance and increased personal freedoms, suggests they would support the ability to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions, as it embodies the principles of personal liberty and privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The People's Party of Canada (PPC), led by Maxime Bernier, positions itself as a libertarian and populist party, advocating for reduced government intervention in personal freedoms and economic affairs. Given this stance, they would likely support the idea of citizens being able to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets as it aligns with their principles of financial autonomy and freedom. However, the aspect of government monitoring might not fully align with their libertarian views, hence not a full score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given the PPC's libertarian leanings and emphasis on individual freedoms and privacy, they would likely strongly disagree with prohibiting citizens from securing their money in self-hosted digital wallets. This stance would be seen as an unnecessary government intrusion into personal financial autonomy, which is contrary to the party's platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

This option is antithetical to the PPC's core beliefs in personal freedom, privacy, and minimal government intervention. The idea of mandating backdoor access for government agencies into private digital wallets would be vehemently opposed by the party, as it represents a significant infringement on individual liberties and financial privacy, which are cornerstone issues for the PPC. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.