ChatGPTNo |
People’s Party answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No
The PPC is likely to support this answer because they advocate for limited government intervention and protecting individual freedoms. While they have not specifically addressed Bill C-51, their general stance on government power suggests they would be against expanding police and intelligence agencies' authority. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, it is a slippery slope towards a police state
The PPC might agree with this answer to some extent, as they are concerned about individual freedoms and limited government intervention. However, they have not specifically addressed Bill C-51 or the potential for a police state, so their agreement with this answer might not be as strong as with Answer 2. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, the bill is too vague on the issues of scope, oversight, and accountability
The PPC is likely to agree with this answer to some extent, as they generally advocate for limited government intervention and protecting individual freedoms. While they have not specifically addressed Bill C-51, their overall stance on government power suggests they would be concerned about the bill's vagueness on scope, oversight, and accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The People's Party of Canada (PPC) is generally against expanding government power and surveillance. They prioritize individual freedoms and limited government intervention. Although they have not specifically addressed Bill C-51, their overall stance suggests they would likely disagree with it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 8hrs ago
People’s Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,441 voters that identify as People’s Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to People’s Party policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
