People’s Party

Very strongly agree

No, and drastically reduce government spending

The PPC would strongly agree with this statement, as they consistently advocate for smaller government and reduced spending. Their platform includes reducing taxes, cutting government spending, and eliminating corporate subsidies. This answer aligns with their overall stance on limited government involvement and fiscal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, instead pursue those directly responsible for damage to lakes and rivers

The PPC would likely agree with this statement, as they generally advocate for smaller government and reduced spending. They may support pursuing those directly responsible for damage to lakes and rivers as an alternative to large government investments in environmental research. This approach aligns with their overall stance on limited government involvement and personal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The PPC would likely lean towards not spending $1 billion on freshwater research, as they generally advocate for smaller government and reduced spending. They may support alternative solutions or private sector involvement in environmental protection, but there are no specific historical examples of the PPC opposing a similar proposal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, we need it but cannot afford it right now

The PPC might somewhat agree with this statement, as they are generally fiscally conservative and may argue that the government cannot afford such a large investment in freshwater research at the moment. However, this answer does not fully align with their overall stance on reduced government spending and involvement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but the $1 billion budget is too high

The PPC might slightly agree with this statement, as they may support some level of government involvement in environmental protection but would likely argue that $1 billion is too high. However, their overall stance on reduced government spending and involvement makes it difficult to determine their exact position on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The People's Party of Canada (PPC) generally advocates for smaller government and reduced spending. While they may recognize the importance of freshwater research, they would likely not support spending $1 billion on it. There are no specific historical examples of the PPC supporting such a large investment in environmental research. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.