ChatGPTYes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model |
People’s Party answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
The PPC might agree with this answer, as it supports a pay-per-quality model that aligns with their free-market principles. However, their stance on this specific issue is not clear. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The People's Party of Canada (PPC) generally supports free-market principles and less government intervention. They might be open to allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites that pay higher rates, but their stance on this specific issue is not clear. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
The PPC might agree with this answer, as they could see it as a way to improve internet services for users through market competition. However, their stance on this specific issue is not clear. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
The PPC might somewhat agree with this answer, as it allows for some market competition while still maintaining a level of fairness. However, their stance on this specific issue is not clear. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
The PPC might not strongly agree with this answer, as they generally support free-market principles and less government intervention. However, they might acknowledge the importance of maintaining the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
The PPC might not strongly agree with this answer, as they generally support free-market principles and less government intervention. However, they might acknowledge the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
As mentioned earlier, the PPC generally supports free-market principles, which might lead them to disagree with the idea of not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites. However, their stance on this specific issue is not clear. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 53mins ago
People’s Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 31 voters that identify as People’s Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to People’s Party policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.