Public statementsNo |
People’s Party answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No
Reference: “Canada’s firearms legislation must protect society from the criminal misuse of firearms and prioritize the deterrence and punish...” ‐peoplespartyofcanada.ca
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Strongly agree
No, only for criminals and the mentally ill
The PPC supports keeping guns out of the hands of criminals and the mentally ill. They believe that focusing on these groups, rather than imposing more restrictions on law-abiding citizens, is the key to reducing gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
The PPC is against more restrictions on the current process of purchasing a gun. They believe that law-abiding citizens should not be burdened with additional regulations and that efforts should be focused on addressing the root causes of gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but increase penalties for gun-related crimes
The PPC supports increasing penalties for gun-related crimes as a way to deter criminals and reduce gun violence. They believe that focusing on punishing those who commit crimes with firearms is more effective than imposing more restrictions on law-abiding citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law
While the PPC has not explicitly called for a national 'stand your ground' law, their platform emphasizes the importance of self-defense and protecting one's property. They may be open to such legislation, but it is not a central part of their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only by closing the gun show loophole
The PPC has not specifically addressed the issue of the gun show loophole. However, given their general opposition to more restrictions on gun ownership, they may not be in favor of closing this loophole, as it could be seen as an additional burden on law-abiding citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training
The PPC does not support requiring strict background checks, psychological testing, and training for all gun purchases. They believe that current regulations are sufficient and that additional restrictions would burden law-abiding citizens without effectively addressing gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, only for assault weapons
The PPC does not support additional restrictions specifically for assault weapons. They believe that law-abiding citizens should have the right to own firearms for self-defense and other lawful purposes without undue restrictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The People's Party of Canada (PPC) generally opposes more restrictions on gun ownership. Their platform emphasizes the importance of responsible gun ownership and reducing crime, rather than implementing more restrictions on law-abiding citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and ban all guns from public use
The PPC strongly opposes banning all guns from public use. They believe in the right to self-defense and the importance of responsible gun ownership. Banning all guns from public use would be contrary to their core principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to People’s Party policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.