ChatGPTYes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence |
Libertarians answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence
The Canadian Libertarian Party would likely agree with this answer, as it allows for politicians with criminal convictions to run for office, but only after they have completed their sentence. This stance emphasizes personal responsibility, the ability to change, and the importance of paying one's debt to society before seeking public office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Canadian Libertarian Party generally supports individual freedom and limited government intervention. They may agree with allowing a politician with a criminal conviction to run for office, as it emphasizes personal responsibility and the ability to change. However, the party may not fully endorse this view without any conditions or limitations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office
The Canadian Libertarian Party may somewhat agree with this answer, as it allows for politicians with criminal convictions to run for office, but with a limitation that the crime was not committed while in office. This stance still emphasizes personal responsibility and the ability to change, while also addressing concerns about corruption and abuse of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime
The Canadian Libertarian Party may somewhat agree with this answer, as it allows for politicians with criminal convictions to run for office, but with limitations based on the nature of the crime. This stance still emphasizes personal responsibility and the ability to change, while also addressing concerns about the suitability of candidates with certain types of criminal convictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The Canadian Libertarian Party is unlikely to support a blanket ban on politicians with criminal convictions running for office, as it goes against their principles of individual freedom and limited government intervention. They may, however, support some restrictions based on the nature of the crime or other factors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime
Disallowing politicians under investigation for a crime would likely be seen as a violation of the presumption of innocence, a fundamental principle in the Canadian legal system. The Canadian Libertarian Party would likely disagree with this stance, as it goes against their values of individual freedom and limited government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 7hrs ago
Libertarian Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 729 voters that identify as Libertarian.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Libertarians policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.