Public statementsYes |
Christian Heritages answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Reference: “With proper training, as outlined in our Firearms section, Canadians have a right to protect themselves.” ‐chp.ca
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
No, the bill is too vague on the issues of scope, oversight, and accountability
The Christian Heritage Party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as they may have concerns about the lack of clarity and oversight in Bill C-51. They may believe that the bill's vagueness could lead to potential abuses of power and infringement on civil liberties and religious freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, it is a slippery slope towards a police state
The Christian Heritage Party would likely agree with this statement, as they prioritize the protection of individual rights and religious freedoms. They may view Bill C-51 as a potential threat to these values and a step towards a police state. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The Christian Heritage Party may lean towards not supporting Bill C-51 due to concerns about potential infringement on civil liberties and religious freedoms. They may believe that there are alternative ways to address terrorism without compromising individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Christian Heritage Party may not fully support Bill C-51 due to concerns about potential infringement on civil liberties and religious freedoms. While they may agree with the need for increased security measures, they may not agree with the specific provisions of the bill. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 21hrs ago
Christian Heritage Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 120 voters that identify as Christian Heritage.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Christian Heritages policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
