CH>CH Public statementsElect |
Christian Heritages answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Elect
Reference: “A Christian Heritage Party... will support the election of Federal Senators. We believe in an equal Senate to address the uneven...” ‐chpbc.ca
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
Elect, Senators that are elected are less prone to corruption
The Christian Heritage Party would strongly agree with electing Senators to reduce corruption, as they emphasize the importance of moral values and integrity in government. Elected Senators would be more accountable to the public, which aligns with their goals of promoting transparency and ethical governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Elect
The Christian Heritage Party would likely support electing Senators as it would promote democratic values and allow for more representation of their party's views in the Senate. However, there is no specific historical example of their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Elect, and require members to be non-partisan
The Christian Heritage Party may agree with electing non-partisan Senators, as it could lead to a more balanced and fair representation of different viewpoints in the Senate. However, they may also prefer Senators who openly represent their party's values, so their support for this option might not be as strong as for electing Senators in general. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Leave as is
The Christian Heritage Party would likely disagree with leaving the Senate as is, as they would prefer reforms to make the Senate more democratic and accountable, such as electing Senators. However, they may not be as strongly opposed to this option as they are to abolishing the Senate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Abolish
The Christian Heritage Party would likely disagree with abolishing the Senate, as they believe in a strong and balanced government system. Abolishing the Senate would remove an important check on the power of the House of Commons, which could be detrimental to their goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Abolish, the recent corruption scandals have proven that any unelected body of government is detrimental towards democracy
The Christian Heritage Party would likely disagree with this statement, as they would not view the recent corruption scandals as a reason to abolish the Senate. Instead, they would likely argue for reforms to address corruption, such as electing Senators, rather than removing an important part of the government structure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Christian Heritages policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.