Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Show more types:

Reply

 @dandymananswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but reduce regulations so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs

 @5BMX4XTanswered…3yrs3Y

No.. Institute a National Health Insurance Model like Canada & South Korea.

 @8QNKSKF from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

This program is one of the worst programs Obama and his administration did . This has caused so many issues for citizens

 @6HDD83R from California  answered…4yrs4Y

- Support free and public healthcare (for those who qualify)
- Officially nationalize all health institutions, where the employees of said health institutions are government employees.
- The U.S. government shall only support any medical procedures with a success rate of 51% or higher
- The U.S. federal government shall cover 50% of the cost of healthcare (while the states, U.S. territories, and Washington D.C., shall cover for the other 50%).
- Only essential and/or beneficial medical procedures (both surgical and non-surgical) shall be covered by the state
- Taxes, tariffs, fees, profi…  Read more

 @8PBY8XC from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

I support the idea, but I would also like for citizens to have the option to have their own private healthcare accounts.

  @8R7JPB5 from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

Healthcare is a necessity for a healthy life, we must begin looking at ways to remove the profit motive from healthcare.

 @38LNC72answered…4yrs4Y

No, either making a universal health care for all -or- open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs. Either would be better as the system we have is anti-competitive with big giveaways to Pharma/Insurance which is why Americans pay more than any other country for health care.

 @2HN4HSXanswered…4yrs4Y

No, I support the spirit of the plan, giving everyone helthcare. However, forcing a product on the population by government mandate with the consequences of fines or even jailtime is unconstitutional and immoral.

 @63ZXW6N from Arizona  answered…4yrs4Y

I dislike the requirement to have it. But aside from that, there should be a public healthcare option available.

 @63ZXW6N from Arizona  answered…3yrs3Y

No, I dislike the requirement to have it. But aside from that, there should be a public healthcare option available.

 @7Y67TWY from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

More Important to lower the price of healthcare procedures to make insurance more attainable for all.

 @87V5TYY from Connecticut  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8D5J4RR from Minnesota  answered…4yrs4Y

 @riddlecongress from Connecticut  answered…5yrs5Y

No, open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs, but I support protecting pre-existing conditions.

 @8L9P7P3 from GU  answered…4yrs4Y

I support it, but private healthcare should also be allowed. It should be a balance of private and public healthcare.

 @8Z6PZKW from Louisiana  answered…3yrs3Y

  @92SJM74 from Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y