In 2010 the Conservative government introduced a crime bill which would kill the so-called faint hope clause that allows some people serving life sentences to apply for parole after 15 years (instead of the usual 25 common for first-degree murder and other life sentence convictions). Opponents of the crime bill argue that extended prison sentences are cruel and will cost the government tens of millions of dollars per year.Proponents argue that 15 years is too short of a prison term for people serving life sentences.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
@99YWX5K2yrs2Y
No, unless there is reason to believe they were wrongfully convicted
@8XRM7Y83yrs3Y
Sa dépend pourquoi il ont fait le crime.
@8XRM5RY3yrs3Y
It depends on many diffrent factors
@8WJHRTXNew Democratic4yrs4Y
yes provided a strict psychological evaluation shows rehabilitation after we provide rehabilitation programs
@8VL8TVS4yrs4Y
It depends why they committed the crime
@8V259T64yrs4Y
It really depends on context of the crime
@8TJ4BKW4yrs4Y
I think it should be longer then 15 years and they cant reapply every two years for parole
@8SYFJW24yrs4Y
Yes if the person is actively involved in a rehabilitation program.
@8PTT29F4yrs4Y
only if the murder was on a pedophile or rapist
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.