In 2010 the Conservative government introduced a crime bill which would kill the so-called faint hope clause that allows some people serving life sentences to apply for parole after 15 years (instead of the usual 25 common for first-degree murder and other life sentence convictions). Opponents of the crime bill argue that extended prison sentences are cruel and will cost the government tens of millions of dollars per year.Proponents argue that 15 years is too short of a prison term for people serving life sentences.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
@9TNV7YD7mos7MO
I believe that It depends on the situation. There has to be reasonable circumstances for there actions.
@9TNV4SJ7mos7MO
i think that under sircumstances if you do it for good reason then you shouldn't get the death penilty like if your doing it based off self denfence
@9J9KZ3H1yr1Y
It depends on the situation as not every criminal charged with first degree murder did it intentionally some do it as a result of self- defence.
@9FG2XZX2yrs2Y
@95DN78B3yrs3Y
Depends on what the situation is
@8RKNW2P4yrs4Y
No and provide more rehabilitation programs for prisoners
@8R5TRVM4yrs4Y
if they have proven that they have changed and that they are not the same person as before
@8PCSKLL4yrs4Y
Yes, as long as strict psychological tests show they are capable of reintegrating into society and they dont pose any threat to society. It should also depend on the severity of the murder.
@8PCRGDB4yrs4Y
It depends on how brutal the murder is, however rapists should be given the death sentance.
@97VVVKT2yrs2Y
Use of a restorative justice system
@8XVFF4T3yrs3Y
depends, I'm not really sure about this one.
@8WNS6FP3yrs3Y
Should be analysed on a case by case basis
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.