In 2010 the Conservative government introduced a crime bill which would kill the so-called faint hope clause that allows some people serving life sentences to apply for parole after 15 years (instead of the usual 25 common for first-degree murder and other life sentence convictions). Opponents of the crime bill argue that extended prison sentences are cruel and will cost the government tens of millions of dollars per year.Proponents argue that 15 years is too short of a prison term for people serving life sentences.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
@9FBTX3T2yrs2Y
No, but we should provide more rehabilitation for all crimes
@9F9V99N2yrs2Y
Depends, it depends on if it was on purpose or accident or out of self defence
@96277V93yrs3Y
In my opinion if someone murderd someone they should be put away for life or put on dead row.
@93VBRYZConservative3yrs3Y
I think prisoners should get the opportunity but must go through a psych eval and be on close watch with parole officers and city police. They should also provide more rehabilitation programs to improve the rate of reintegrated prisoners.
@8Z3WNDV3yrs3Y
Parole should be decreased to 5 years, and able to be halved if there is good behavior in prison.
@8WKWC7Z4yrs4Y
yes, but it depends on what they did.
@8WKVV8JNew Democratic4yrs4Y
As long as they are trying to save themself or as an accident.
@962BT7C3yrs3Y
It depends on who they murdered and how they did it.
It depends on the motive.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.