Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsCriminal Issues10yrs ago1 here now

Should prisoners serving life sentences for first degree murder be eligible for a parole hearing after 15 years?

In 2010 the Conservative government introduced a crime bill which would kill the so-called faint hope clause that allows some people serving life sentences to apply for parole after 15 years (instead of the usual 25 common for first-degree murder and other life sentence convictions). Opponents of the crime bill argue that extended prison sentences are cruel and will cost the government tens of millions of dollars per year.Proponents argue that 15 years is too short of a prison term for people serving life sentences.

+
Expand
+ Settings

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Political party:

Ideology:

Political theme:

Province/Territory:

Electoral District (2011):

Electoral District (2013):

Postal Code:

Polling Division:

Reply

 @9QS5ZBQfrom Ontario  answered…9mos9MO

I think with how psychologically ill some of the criminals can be, and what they are clearly capable of doing, it depends on how much progress the specific criminal has made in their journey to not being a threat to society.

 @8ZW4784from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

yes, if the victim's family and friends allow it and feel comfortable with it

 @8WKVMTHGreenfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

they should do a hearing after 10 years

 @8VVL8BTfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

If there was a good reason for the murder. Like their child’s rapist then YES but if it was a cold blood murder with no strong reasoning nope

 @8VT6FF8from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

I would have to know more about this subject to answer

 @8VL78QHfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Only if for a retrial as they claim not guilty.

 @8VBYPRHGreenfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

I think this is dependent on the individual. I think that a strict psychological evaluation showing they are no longer a threat to society and also providing more rehabilitation programs for prisoners is a good idea.

 @8SY9V6Vfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

yes, but depending on the circumstance

 @8RDST2Jfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Provide rehabilitation but keep death penalty

 @8QDJV4Hfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Only if it was out of vengeance.

 @8FNZ34Nfrom Ontario  answered…5yrs5Y

rehabilitation and education during sentence and no chance for parole, also clearing of psychological state and long, strict probation

 @99HWZJ6Greenfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

No but any other serious crime committed should be sent to life without a second chance

 @98LVHLYGreenfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Depends on the stances of First degree Murder, A Fatal car accident is considered first Degree Murder

 @8YT27S8from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Depends on their situation

 @8VH7858Communistfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

after 20 years they should be given the right to a parole hearing

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

Active 2hrs ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

Kamala Harris is considering running for president again in 2028

Kamala Harris has been lying low since her defeat in the presidential race, unwinding with family and senior aides in Hawaii before heading back to the nation’s capital.But privately, the vice president has been instructing advisers and allies to keep her options open — whether for a possible 2028 presidential run, or even to run for governor in her home state of California in two years. As Harris has repeated in phone calls, “I am staying in the fight.”She is expected to explore those and other possible paths forward with family members over the winter holiday season, according to five people in the Harris inner circle, who were granted anonymity to discuss internal dynamics. Her deliberations follow an extraordinary four months in which Harris went from President Joe Biden’s running mate to the top of the ticket, reenergizing Democrats before ultimately crashing on election night.“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”Harris concedes: 'We must accept the results of this election'SharePlay VideoMost immediately, Harris and her advisers are working to define how and when she will speak out against Donald Trump and reassert her own role in the Democratic Party. Closing out her term as vice president, she’s set to preside over certifying the November election she lost to Trump, and then appear at the once-and-future president’s inauguration on Jan. 20.“There will be a desire to hear her voice, and there won’t be a vacuum for long,” a person close to Harris said.At the same time, Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff, will have a long checklist to plow through before they leave the Naval Observatory for good.They have to decide whether they’ll take up permanent residence at their home in Los Angeles, or establish a base elsewhere. No matter where Harris and her family live, some around her have expressed concerns about safety, as her Secret Service protection expires six months after stepping away.

▲  1027 replies