Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsCriminal Issues10yrs ago

Should prisoners serving life sentences for first degree murder be eligible for a parole hearing after 15 years?

In 2010 the Conservative government introduced a crime bill which would kill the so-called faint hope clause that allows some people serving life sentences to apply for parole after 15 years (instead of the usual 25 common for first-degree murder and other life sentence convictions). Opponents of the crime bill argue that extended prison sentences are cruel and will cost the government tens of millions of dollars per year.Proponents argue that 15 years is too short of a prison term for people serving life sentences.

+
Expand
+ Settings

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Political party:

Ideology:

Political theme:

Province/Territory:

Electoral District (2011):

Electoral District (2013):

Postal Code:

Polling Division:

Reply

 @9YKHL3Bfrom Manitoba  answered…5mos5MO

No, they shouldn’t be allowed to get parole the damages they have done has already happened and can’t be taken back instead they should live out their lives in prison and wait for what judgement lies in death

 @9VQSDXQfrom Manitoba  answered…6mos6MO

I think depending on how brutal and groosum the crime was that should be the deciding factor whether or not they receive the hearing.

 @9MGWNDZfrom Manitoba  answered…11mos11MO

I think that the prisoner should stay longer and pay for what they have done. Taking another persons life should not be let down so easily.

 @9GJ29F6from Manitoba  answered…1yr1Y

In my opinion, anybody sentenced to prison should be allowed parole if good behavior is shown and tests show that this behavior is genuine.

 @8X8B6QXfrom Manitoba  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes as long as they show improved behavior and a change while in jail

 @8VLFK96New Democraticfrom Manitoba  answered…4yrs4Y

Our entire prison system needs to be re-worked.

 @8PJF63Dfrom Manitoba  answered…4yrs4Y

it should be after 25 years

 @9898FLYfrom Manitoba  answered…2yrs2Y

depends how many people and age

 @989867Ffrom Manitoba  answered…2yrs2Y

if the person is younger then absoulutley

 @977S66Gfrom Manitoba  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes but it depends on the situation of the murder and how greusome it was.

 @977RWL2New Democraticfrom Manitoba  answered…2yrs2Y

Dependant on severity of murder and the state of the prisoner

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

Active 2hrs ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

Kamala Harris is considering running for president again in 2028

Kamala Harris has been lying low since her defeat in the presidential race, unwinding with family and senior aides in Hawaii before heading back to the nation’s capital.But privately, the vice president has been instructing advisers and allies to keep her options open — whether for a possible 2028 presidential run, or even to run for governor in her home state of California in two years. As Harris has repeated in phone calls, “I am staying in the fight.”She is expected to explore those and other possible paths forward with family members over the winter holiday season, according to five people in the Harris inner circle, who were granted anonymity to discuss internal dynamics. Her deliberations follow an extraordinary four months in which Harris went from President Joe Biden’s running mate to the top of the ticket, reenergizing Democrats before ultimately crashing on election night.“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”Harris concedes: 'We must accept the results of this election'SharePlay VideoMost immediately, Harris and her advisers are working to define how and when she will speak out against Donald Trump and reassert her own role in the Democratic Party. Closing out her term as vice president, she’s set to preside over certifying the November election she lost to Trump, and then appear at the once-and-future president’s inauguration on Jan. 20.“There will be a desire to hear her voice, and there won’t be a vacuum for long,” a person close to Harris said.At the same time, Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff, will have a long checklist to plow through before they leave the Naval Observatory for good.They have to decide whether they’ll take up permanent residence at their home in Los Angeles, or establish a base elsewhere. No matter where Harris and her family live, some around her have expressed concerns about safety, as her Secret Service protection expires six months after stepping away.

▲  1027 replies