Several Western countries including France, Spain and Canada have proposed laws which would ban Muslim women from wearing a Niqab in public spaces. A niqab is a cloth that covers the face and is worn by some Muslim women in public areas. In 2015 the Canadian Supreme Court overturned a Ottawa’s request to ban niqab’s when women were taking citizenship oaths. Proponents argue that the ban infringes on individual rights and prevents people from expressing their religious beliefs. Opponents argue that face-coverings prevent the clear identification of a person, which is both a security risk, and a social hindrance within a society which relies on facial recognition and expression in communication.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
Political theme:
Province/Territory:
@97T4JZCConservative2yrs2Y
Yes, respect other cultures, but their identity must be privately verified by a female staff member, and Hijabs should be fine, but face covering like burkas should either be privately verified by a female staffer or banned. Burkas are usually used in more radical sects of islam
@96QMCSHConservative2yrs2Y
Persons choice in how to present themselves
@8VRYCY3Conservative4yrs4Y
no we want women to have rights of free will
@8ZW42TKConservative3yrs3Y
@fjamalConservative3yrs3Y
No, while it is important to respect and celebrate our heritage, prioritizing assimilation into Canadian culture is important.
@8T83KHGConservative4yrs4Y
No to wearing for identification cards and for police interactions when needed
@6HDD83R4yrs4Y
No, Islamic clothing (e.g. Hijabs, burqas, niqabs, Chadors, Taqiyah, and other Islamic clothing) (for men and women) should be permanently and irrevocably banned in predominantly and potentially predominantly Republican states, U.S. territories, counties and county-equivalents, Washington D.C., cities, towns, villages, Indian reservations, Census Designated Areas (CDP's) and other unincorporated areas and unincorporated communities, etc
@8WRGD393yrs3Y
i dont support something i dont even know what it means
@892HFDV3yrs3Y
Yes but they should be have their identity verified by a staff member (male or female) and should be required to provide a valid gov't issued photo ID (such as a driver's license) and display it throughout the duration of the ceremony.
@8RSTXFT4yrs4Y
Yes, anyone should be able to wear whatever they want, as long as it doesn't conflict with a general uniform.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
