No

Bill C-51, introduced in Canada in 2015, was a controversial anti-terrorism bill that expanded government surveillance powers, allowed for greater information sharing between agencies, and broadened the definition of security threats. Critics of the bill (the "No" position) argued that it threatened civil liberties, privacy rights, and lacked sufficient oversight.

If there is a terrorist in canada or a city in canada the police should have the authority to deal with the terrorist

Supporting Bill C-51 acknowledges the imperative of addressing modern security threats despite concerns over civil liberties. The legislation offers enhanced tools for law enforcement and intelligence agencies to combat terrorism and radicalization, fostering improved information sharing and coordination. While vigilance for potential abuses is crucial, rejecting the bill entirely risks leaving Canada vulnerable to evolving threats. Balancing security with civil liberties necessitates robust oversight mechanisms to safeguard individual rights while effectively countering terrorism. Ultimately, Bill C-51 represents a necessary step toward bolstering national security in an increasingly complex and interconnected world.

If you want to create safer enviorments for people of all backgrounds and more equality you need more law enforcement

If you want to create safer enviorments for people of all backgrounds and more equality you need more law enforcement

My counterargument in favor of Bill C-51 is that it provides tools to fight terrorism and protect national security, making sure of public safety. Supporters feel that the balance between security and civil freedoms may be kept with enough control.