Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionstransportation10yrs ago

Should the government permit the use of drones for commercial purposes?

In the first 4 months of 2015 Transport Canada issued 1,600 permits for commercial drones. In contrast, the U.S.’s Federal Aviation Administration issued only 69. Over 110 companies in Canada now provide commercial drone services, which are regularly used by the movie and television industry, oil and gas companies, forestry companies and farmers.

+
Expand
+ Settings

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Political party:

Ideology:

Political theme:

Province/Territory:

Electoral District (2011):

Electoral District (2013):

Postal Code:

Polling Division:

Reply

 @93R6SB9from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

yes and no for privacy reasons

 @8WL54V5from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

why? there's no use for that I think

 @8TKMP3Wfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Only on their property

 @8TJ6F6MLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, as long as strict regulations are created

 @8TJ5P73New Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, as long as there are regulations and that is is monitored.

 @8SRR7FHLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

No unless they use the drones on their own property

 @8Q9J99Dfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

As long as no one's privacy is being invaded.

 @8HZ32NMNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, however which cases these drones can be used in has to be public information and the regulations should be made with experts in fields such as security.

 @9CMRV3GNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, provided they are used responsibly and legally.

 @3F9WGB4from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Only with a registered flight plan, accountability to fly only where approved or else lose the privilege to do so.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

Active 3hrs ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

Kamala Harris is considering running for president again in 2028

Kamala Harris has been lying low since her defeat in the presidential race, unwinding with family and senior aides in Hawaii before heading back to the nation’s capital.But privately, the vice president has been instructing advisers and allies to keep her options open — whether for a possible 2028 presidential run, or even to run for governor in her home state of California in two years. As Harris has repeated in phone calls, “I am staying in the fight.”She is expected to explore those and other possible paths forward with family members over the winter holiday season, according to five people in the Harris inner circle, who were granted anonymity to discuss internal dynamics. Her deliberations follow an extraordinary four months in which Harris went from President Joe Biden’s running mate to the top of the ticket, reenergizing Democrats before ultimately crashing on election night.“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”Harris concedes: 'We must accept the results of this election'SharePlay VideoMost immediately, Harris and her advisers are working to define how and when she will speak out against Donald Trump and reassert her own role in the Democratic Party. Closing out her term as vice president, she’s set to preside over certifying the November election she lost to Trump, and then appear at the once-and-future president’s inauguration on Jan. 20.“There will be a desire to hear her voice, and there won’t be a vacuum for long,” a person close to Harris said.At the same time, Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff, will have a long checklist to plow through before they leave the Naval Observatory for good.They have to decide whether they’ll take up permanent residence at their home in Los Angeles, or establish a base elsewhere. No matter where Harris and her family live, some around her have expressed concerns about safety, as her Secret Service protection expires six months after stepping away.

▲  1027 replies