Canadian federal officials recommended that leaders of major opposition parties receive regular classified briefings to better understand national security threats. The proposal, made nearly a year ago, aims to ensure that all political leaders are equipped with intelligence-informed insights, especially ahead of elections. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has drawn attention for refusing to obtain the top-secret clearance required to access these briefings. The move is seen as part of a broader effort to safeguard Canadian democracy from foreign interference and other threats. The government believes bipartisan access to intelligence is crucial for informed political discourse and decision-making.
@75KGLJVConservatism14hrs14H
Seems like the Liberals are more focused on secret backroom briefings than actually protecting our elections in the open.
@ISIDEWITH14hrs14H
Feds proposing regular ‘intelligence-informed briefings’ for opposition leaders: memo
A newly released memo shows federal officials recommended almost a year ago that leaders of major opposition parties receive regular classified briefings — not only on foreign
@ISIDEWITH14hrs14H
Before election, feds urged classified briefings for opposition leaders
The internal memo says the proposed briefings would ensure security-cleared leaders are offered an 'intelligence-informed understanding' of the threats facing Canadians.
@ISIDEWITH14hrs14H
Feds proposing regular ‘intelligence-informed briefings’ for opposition leaders
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre continues to face questions on the campaign trail about his refusal to seek the top secret-level clearance necessary to receive such briefings.
@7G7BBRZLiberalism14hrs14H
Honestly, if Poilievre really cared about protecting our democracy, he'd get the clearance and take the briefings—this shouldn't be a partisan issue.
@HumanR1ghtsMusselLibertarian14hrs14H
Sounds like another example of the government using "national security" as an excuse to centralize power and limit transparency. If something is important enough to influence elections, why keep it behind closed doors? Politicians should be accountable to the public, not just to bureaucrats with classified files.
@EqualityTurtleSocialism14hrs14H
It’s wild how the government will bend over backwards to protect “national security” but still won’t give working people real security like housing or fair wages. Secret briefings for party elites just reinforce the idea that politics is a closed-door club instead of something ordinary people can trust. If they’re serious about protecting democracy, how about starting with transparency and actual accountability? Poilievre refusing clearance just shows how unserious he is—playing games while the rest of us deal with real issues.
@7KM9Y5ZNationalism14hrs14H
This just shows how deep the federal government wants to pull everyone into their secretive games. National security is important, sure, but making backroom briefings the norm isn’t how a transparent democracy should work. Poilievre’s right to be skeptical—Canadians deserve leaders who aren’t blindly swallowing whatever the bureaucrats feed them. We should be protecting our elections by putting Canada first, not by relying on hush-hush meetings run by Ottawa elites.
Isn’t it funny how the same government that constantly hides things from the public now wants to give "secret briefings" to politicians behind closed doors? Sounds more like a way to control the narrative than protect democracy. Good on Poilievre for not jumping through their hoops—why should he need a security clearance just to know what voters deserve to know anyway? Regular people don’t get classified briefings, but we’re the ones who pay for all this. If they really cared about election integrity, they’d be more transparent with the public, not less.
Join in on more popular conversations.
