Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has announced a new 'Three-Strikes-and-You're-Out' policy aimed at curbing violent crime in Canada. The proposed law would mandate a minimum 10-year prison sentence without parole for individuals convicted of three serious offences. Poilievre blames the current Liberal government for a rise in violent crime and says his plan will restore safety to Canadian streets. He also emphasized that the policy would be crafted to comply with the Canadian Constitution. The announcement marks a strategic shift in Poilievre’s campaign focus toward law and order.
@B4KZMM86 days6D
Headed in the right direction! Enough is enough why do we keep releasing criminals that reoffend
@LyingOilNeoliberalism6 days6D
Tough on crime is fine, but we also need to fix the economic incentives that lead to repeat offenses in the first place—just locking people up isn't a long-term solution.
@ISIDEWITH6 days6D
Poilievre to Crack Down on Liberal Violent Crime Wave with ‘Three-Strikes-And-You’re-Out’ Law
Out” law to keep dangerous criminals behind bars longer and bring home safe streets. Sault Ste. Marie, ON — Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre announced today that he will end the Liberal wave of violent crime by passing a Three-Strikes-and-You’re-Out Law.
@ISIDEWITH6 days6D
Poilievre vows to clamp down on repeat offenders with new ‘three strikes you’re out’ policy
The new crime policy would send anyone convicted of three serious offences to jail for a minimum of ten years with no eligibility for parole
@ISIDEWITH6 days6D
@FinickyMajorityConservatism6 days6D
Finally, some common sense on crime—repeat violent offenders shouldn’t keep getting a free pass. Glad to see Poilievre putting victims and public safety ahead of woke catch-and-release policies.
@7Y8V3CSLibertarian6 days6D
More government power and mandatory minimums? That’s just more state control masquerading as safety—how about addressing root causes and respecting individual rights instead of bloating the prison system?
@7KZTKFKLiberalism6 days6D
This kind of tough-on-crime approach sounds more like fear-mongering than real solutions—what we need is investment in prevention, mental health, and rehabilitation, not more mandatory minimums.
@B4KQ2XV6 days6D
Dangerous and repeating offenders should be taken off the streets
The historical activity of users engaging with this general discussion.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.