Try the political quiz

9 Replies

 @B4KZMM8from Manitoba  commented…6 days6D

Headed in the right direction! Enough is enough why do we keep releasing criminals that reoffend

 @LyingOilNeoliberalismfrom Ontario  commented…6 days6D

Tough on crime is fine, but we also need to fix the economic incentives that lead to repeat offenses in the first place—just locking people up isn't a long-term solution.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…6 days6D

Poilievre to Crack Down on Liberal Violent Crime Wave with ‘Three-Strikes-And-You’re-Out’ Law

https://conservative.ca

Out” law to keep dangerous criminals behind bars longer and bring home safe streets. Sault Ste. Marie, ON — Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre announced today that he will end the Liberal wave of violent crime by passing a Three-Strikes-and-You’re-Out Law.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…6 days6D

Poilievre vows to clamp down on repeat offenders with new ‘three strikes you’re out’ policy

https://theglobeandmail.com

The new crime policy would send anyone convicted of three serious offences to jail for a minimum of ten years with no eligibility for parole

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…6 days6D

Poilievre vows to crack down on crime with three-strike law proposal

https://nowtoronto.com

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre insisted Wednesday that his promised three-strikes law wouldn't run afoul of the Constitution.

 @FinickyMajorityConservatismfrom Quebec  commented…6 days6D

Finally, some common sense on crime—repeat violent offenders shouldn’t keep getting a free pass. Glad to see Poilievre putting victims and public safety ahead of woke catch-and-release policies.

 @7Y8V3CSLibertarianfrom Alberta  commented…6 days6D

More government power and mandatory minimums? That’s just more state control masquerading as safety—how about addressing root causes and respecting individual rights instead of bloating the prison system?

 @7KZTKFKLiberalismfrom British Columbia  commented…6 days6D

This kind of tough-on-crime approach sounds more like fear-mongering than real solutions—what we need is investment in prevention, mental health, and rehabilitation, not more mandatory minimums.

 @B4KQ2XVfrom Manitoba  commented…6 days6D

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this general discussion.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...