Should funding for local police departments be redirected to social and community based programs?
Yes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls
While the concept of unarmed community responders may seem like a helpful solution, the reality is that they cannot operate without police ensuring the scene is safe. I would personally welcome additional support from community responders — it would alleviate some of my workload. However, when there is any potential for violence, police presence is essential.
In situations involving individuals in mental health crises, intoxication, or heightened agitation, the risk of unpredictable and violent behavior is always present. I have responded to numerous medical calls simply because a weapon was known to have been present in the household at some point. I’ve also worked alongside mobile crisis units, and while their assistance is invaluable, they always rely on police to secure the scene before engaging. This practice is not only necessary but prudent, ensuring their safety as well as the safety of those in crisis.
It’s important to recognize that while police are not without flaws, they are not the root of the problem. In fact, law enforcement could greatly benefit from increased funding for specialized training in crisis management and de-escalation. However, even with the most advanced training and the most compassionate approach, no one can fully predict or control how an individual in crisis will react. This level of uncertainty is something that can only be truly understood through lived experience.
Ultimately, a collaborative approach, where police and community responders work together, is the most effective way to ensure public safety while providing the necessary care for those in need.
Be the first to reply to this disagreement.
Join in on more popular conversations.