Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
@9GNVN2DConservative 1yr1Y
The police are a necessary institution. If we replace the police with unarmed community protectors, then armed criminals will have free reign over the community.
@9GR3NMQ1yr1Y
yes I agree, dont defund the police. If you do the crime rate will skyrocket and no one will be able to help.
@B47HHJ4 2wks2W
As a police officer, I can speak from firsthand experience. While the concept of unarmed community responders may seem like a helpful solution, the reality is that they cannot operate without police ensuring the scene is safe. I would personally welcome additional support from community responders — it would alleviate some of my workload. However, when there is any potential for violence, police presence is essential.
In situations involving individuals in mental health crises, intoxication, or heightened agitation, the risk of unpredictable and violent behavior is always present. I have… Read more
@B2Z6Y2T2mos2MO
This would put more people in danger, police are trained for their job and are there to keep our community safe.
@B2VZ7532mos2MO
The police are a necessary institution. If we replace the police with unarmed community protectors, then armed criminals will have free reign over the community.
@B2LTH7V2mos2MO
Don't defund the police, Don't defund the police because they play a key role in defending the community and stopping crime.
@B29K7YN 3mos3MO
I don't think we should be defunding the police at all there are a lot of areas in cities that have a lot of violence and I think having the police around as a defense system helps keep control of these communities and keep people safe like high crime communities in areas like Toronto and other big city centers.
@B26RNKH 3mos3MO
Policing is a dynamic career. No two calls will ever be the same. You cannot guarantee that the mental health call will not turn violent. To implement this is to risk the lives of brave men and women who want to serve their community.
@9MBKLKH11mos11MO
Unarmed community based responders could not help people who are in serious danger because of a dangerous person since these responders they aren't armed.
@9LN6DW2 12mos12MO
If the police is defunded, there will be more crimes and more violence across the country. We should fund the police to ensure they are better trained to prevent abuse of power.
@9JB4NGS1yr1Y
That may be a bad idea because then the people resonding wouldn't have any authority and things could get bad quick.
@9H5W9QH1yr1Y
we need police to protect us and the community won't do **** , we are all so stupid and act like pussies we will just sit and cry. keep police do not replace them.
@9H4JBHG1yr1Y
Defunding the Police would create cities that are lawless and dangerous, in some cases police are needed more than non violent responders
@9H2LSVD1yr1Y
Any call can turn into a violent call very quickly and it is very important that the police always respond to any call wether it is violent or not as they are highly trained in defending themselves as well as socially. The police should not be defunded, if anthing funded more as they are what keeps society together.
@9H2B3T51yr1Y
its dumb because anything can happen peacefull or not you should be ready and be able to defend yourself. defunding the police is the dumbist thing ive seen just because there was one corrupt individual does mean all police are corrupt you need balance without balance its caos.
@9H27VF21yr1Y
Just because the call is non-violent doesn't mean it can't turn violent. It's better for the police to be armed just in case it's needed. Better to have it and not need it then need it and not have it.
@9FQPQYV2yrs2Y
Unarmed responders are more likely to be injured if a violent crime breaks out. We should increase police funding for training so they can precisely handle non-violent and violent crimes.
@9F83S572yrs2Y
no because if police dont have any defense like taser pepper spray or gun they will not be feared and more likely to be attacked and disobeyed
Police should be funded more and trained at a higher level, we aren’t ready as a society to allow a community based responder to a non-violent call, and it simply creates more dissolution. Community based responders could have tendencies to escalate situations and fail to find common ground, especially without training, as a community we should seek to help individuals in need, but we haven’t progressed to a stage to allow such organizations. We should focus on the root of crime, and limit corruption before disposing such tasks on a community as a whole.
@9FBW4XQ2yrs2Y
Police are required to use proportionally appropriate force when responding. Defunding the police will allow violent criminals to flourish and the citizenry will then be forced to take the law into their own hands to protect their property and their person. Criminals disproportionately prey on unarmed community members; they can’t be expected to enforce legislation
@9FBMFH6Conservative2yrs2Y
If there are no armed Community res ponders and there is a shooting who is going to protect people during that time
@9FDLFXT2yrs2Y
If it turns violent throughout the interaction law enforcement needs too be able to defend themselves.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.