Try the political quiz
 @ISIDEWITHNewsCanadaPublic TransportationAlbertaCalgaryGreen Line LRTPolitical Dispute•••4mos ago

Calgary's Green Line LRT Project Caught in Political Turmoil

Calgary's ambitious Green Line LRT project is at the center of a political dispute involving city officials, the Alberta provincial government, and opposition leaders. Mayor Jyoti Gondek is seeking discussions with Premier Danielle Smith regarding the future of the project, amidst accusations from the United Conservative government blaming former mayor and NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi for mismanagement. The controversy has escalated as the provincial government is accused of retracting previously promised funds, leading to uncertainty about the project's progression. A crucial decision by the Calgary city council is anticipated on September 17, which will determine the project's fate.

11 Replies

 @MercifulL1bertarianFiscal Conservatismfrom Alberta  commented…4mos4MO

Typical, throwing more taxpayer money into a project just for it to get tangled in political games; they should focus on fiscal responsibility instead.

 @QuokkaHaileyNeoliberalismfrom Ontario  commented…4mos4MO

Cutting through the political drama, it's clear that investing in the Green Line LRT is essential for Calgary's economic growth and urban development.

 @QuorumMiaConservatismfrom Alberta  commented…4mos4MO

I can't believe this project is getting bogged down in political games. It's clear that sound fiscal management and responsible governance are taking a back seat to petty squabbles. We need leaders who prioritize the efficient use of taxpayer dollars and ensure projects like the Green Line are completed without unnecessary delays or political interference.

 @MorbidRavenGreen Politicsfrom Ontario  commented…4mos4MO

It's frustrating to see vital green infrastructure like the Green Line LRT caught in political games instead of focusing on the environmental and community benefits it promises.

 @SausageDougLibertarianfrom Ontario  commented…4mos4MO

The situation with Calgary's Green Line LRT project is a clear example of how government overreach and mismanagement can stall progress and waste taxpayer money. It's frustrating to see political squabbles derail a project that has the potential to benefit the community. The back-and-forth blame game between the city officials and the provincial government is a distraction from the real issues at hand. What we need is transparency and accountability, not endless debates and accusations. The government should facilitate infrastructure projects by creating a favorable environment for private investment, instead of bogging them down with bureaucratic red tape. Ultimately, the people of Calgary deserve efficient, cost-effective solutions that improve their daily lives without becoming mired in political turmoil.

 @VetoOil_343Liberalismfrom Quebec  commented…4mos4MO

Wow, the drama around Calgary's Green Line LRT project just keeps unfolding, doesn't it? It's disheartening to see such a crucial initiative for the city's future get tangled up in political squabbling. Public transportation projects like this are vital for reducing traffic congestion, cutting down on emissions, and making cities more livable. It's frustrating when politics gets in the way of progress, especially when it comes to environmental sustainability and improving citizens' quality of life. I hope Mayor Gondek and Premier Smith can find some common ground…  Read more

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…4mos4MO

Calgary Green Line LRT in political crossfire, as Alberta minister blames NDP leader

https://rdnewsnow.com

Premier Danielle Smith’s United Conservative government is blaming former mayor, NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi, for past mismanagement, while Calgary city council is pointing the finger at the province for taking back cash it’s already promised.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…4mos4MO

Calgary’s Green Line faces uncertainty as city eyes project’s transfer to province

https://globalnews.ca

Mayor Gondek's office confirmed they're seeking meetings with Premier Danielle Smith to discuss the Green Line, as council's decision on a path forward is expected on Sept. 17.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

If you were a decision-maker in Calgary, would you prioritize the Green Line LRT project over other budget concerns, considering the environmental benefits?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

What impact do you believe political turmoil has on the progress of vital city infrastructure projects and how should cities navigate these challenges?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

How important do you think it is for local governments to focus on environmentally friendly transport solutions like the Green Line LRT, despite political disagreements?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1mo1MO

Vetting Fiasco: Trump's Defense Pick Caught in Sexual Assault Allegation Storm

CNN commentator and New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman said President-elect Donald Trump’s team missed Pete Hegseth’s payoff to a sexual assault accuser when they vetted him to be secretary of defense.Hegseth is among a raft of cabinet picks facing tough confirmations, and who aren’t being subjected to the customary FBI checks, instead being vetted by private firms. Over the weekend, Hegseth’s attorney dropped the bomb that there was a confidential settlement with a woman who accused the former Fox News host of sexual assault. On Monday night’s edition of CNN’s The Source with Kaitlan Collins, Haberman revealed that her sources in Trump world did not know about the payoff, which was missed in the vetting “because it was a private settlement”HABERMAN: There’s more concern from some people around Trump than there is from Trump himself, about this whole issue. Trump has really dug in, and has told advisers that he is going to stick with Hegseth. Now, we’ll see if anything else emerges.They did do a vet, we are told. This did not show up, this issue, because it was a private settlement, according to the people, who were briefed on what took place. Trump really likes Pete Hegseth. But this did introduce the thing Trump doesn’t like, which is an element of surprise and a negative headline. And so, we will see where this goes.

▲  59 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2mos2MO

Inside the Podcast Revolution: Trump’s Unfiltered Strategy and Harris’s ‘Meltdown’ Risk

Tech billionaire Elon Musk attributed President-elect Trump’s election victory, at least in part, to the lengthy podcast interviews he did during the campaign.In an interview late Tuesday with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, Musk said Trump’s podcast appearances showed the American public that he was a normal person.“I think it made a big difference that President Trump and soon-to-be Vice President Vance went on lengthy podcasts,” Musk said in the interview.“I think this really makes a difference because people look at, like, Joe Rogan’s podcast, which is great, and Lex Fridman’s and the All-In podcast, and, you know, to a reasonable-minded, smart person — who’s not, like, hardcore one way or the other — they just listen to someone talk for a few hours and that’s how they decide whether, you know, you’re a good person, whether they like you,” he added, according to a clip highlighted by Mediaite.Trump conducted many interviews with new media during his campaign, as well as with legacy news organizations such as Fox News.Last month, he joined Joe Rogan’s podcast for a 3-hour long interview. The celebrity host later endorsed his candidacy.His opponent, Vice President Harris, did not appear on Rogan’s podcast because, according to “The Joe Rogan Experience” host, the Harris campaign only had an hour and required him to travel to her. Rogan said he felt “strongly” that the “best way to do” an interview with the vice president would have been in his studio in Austin, Texas.Musk recalled posting on his social platform X account that “nothing would do more damage” to Harris’s campaign than going on Rogan’s podcast, “because she would run out of non-sequiturs after about 45 minutes.”“You can’t hide for three hours,” Carlson replied.Musk added, “Yeah, like, hour two and three would be a complete melted puddle of nonsense. So it would just be absolute game over. That’s why she didn’t go on.”“But on the other hand, Trump, he’s there, and there’s no, there’s no talking points,” the Tesla CEO continued. “He’s just being a normal person who’s having a conversation, and doing three hours of Rogan, no problem.”

▲  349 replies

Active 13hrs ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…6 days6D

Defense Bill Blocks Transgender Care To Minors

The Senate on Wednesday gave final approval to a defense policy bill directing $895 billion toward the Pentagon and other military activities, moving over the objections of some Democrats who opposed a provision added late in the negotiations that would deny coverage for transgender health procedures for minors.The 85-to-14 vote, coming a week after a divided House passed the same measure, cleared the bill for President Biden’s signature.Most Republicans and many Democrats supported the measure, which provides a 14.5 percent pay raise to junior enlisted service members and a 4.5 percent pay raise for all other service members. It also expands access to meal assistance, housing and child care programs that benefit those in uniform.But several Democrats withheld their backing in protest of a provision preventing TRICARE, the military’s health care plan for service members, from covering “medical interventions for the treatment of gender dysphoria that could result in sterilization” for children under 18.The language, which would affect the gender-transitioning children of service members, was recently added to the measure at the insistence of Speaker Mike Johnson, Republican of Louisiana, who refused to bring a defense bill to the House floor without it, according to aides familiar with the negotiations.Twenty-one Democrats, led by Senator Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, proposed an amendment to strip the provision from the bill, but the matter was never brought to a vote. Several of them took to the floor on Tuesday to lodge their objections.“It’s flat-out wrong to put this provision in this bill and take away a service member’s freedom to make that decision for their families,” Ms. Baldwin said, estimating that the provision could negatively affect as many as 6,000 to 7,000 military families.

▲  1913 replies3 agree