Regulating AI involves setting guidelines and standards to ensure AI systems are used ethically and safely. Proponents argue that it prevents misuse, protects privacy, and ensures AI benefits society. Opponents argue that excessive regulation could hinder innovation and technological advancement.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Show more types:
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Province/Territory:
@B4DQHBR2wks2W
Depends, maybe it's best to do half of the work with actual work and the other half with AI in my humble opinion.
@B4D9DQY2wks2W
I think that AI is apart of our lives now and its just going to keep on developing as time goes on. As time goes on AI will keep getting stronger. But I don't think regulating it will help with anything
@B4P2G525 days5D
Yes, AI is getting out of hand. There’s a lot of promotion with famous people that leads to misinformation.
@B4P2FND5 days5D
Only if it's an emergency, and make sure to guarantee that there are no errors or things that cound hurt the country
@B4L3YQY1wk1W
It should be strong and minimal rules set by the government. If the government gets to close then it turns into a propaganda machine, but if they aren’t close enough ai will be used for bad
@B3ZF5471mo1MO
Yes, but only in the case of using people's identities/face when creating rumours, false information or for sexual purposes.
@B2H2B2B3mos3MO
I do not believe the use of AI is a government issue. I believe that if something harmful is posted online that was made with the use of AI it should be investigated in a case-by-case basis but I feel that there is no need to regulate day-to-day usage of AI.
@9VHWJLTNew Democratic7mos7MO
Bio-engineering and financial AI should be regulated, AI for creative or education purposes should not be regulated.
@9V7H6SQConservative7mos7MO
We need unbiased public information on how this positively or negatively affects the general public.
@9TYP75W7mos7MO
Not necessarily since perople should have their own rights and morials. They are also not a serious threat.
@9RPDQJJ9mos9MO
What we colloquially refer to as "AI", is not yet actually AI. At the moment, it is too early to make such a decision. As "AI" can and is used as a tool, anyone using it in unethical ways is not shielded or obfuscated from the law simply because AI is involved. It might be more difficult to detect, but no less relevant to existing laws.
@9P37WBJ10mos10MO
They should get rid of it; its creepy and is taking jobs away from artists
@9YKVWYHNew Democratic5mos5MO
AI is difficult because its a new thing. It can be used for good and bad, so Its a case-by-case basis.
@9WR8G396mos6MO
Yes, so private info of people are safe, no deep fake of anything, but not to a point where this can cover up dirt from the gov
@9WPPMKFRhinoceros6mos6MO
Yes the government should regulate AI. This regulation should enforce that it is illegal to use AI to spread fake news.
@9W9SNZZ6mos6MO
Yes. They should make sure the end of ai art and said aid stop taking jobs from hard working artists
@9W97PGM6mos6MO
even if it were to be regulated, it would only be an attempt at best and AI would outgrow the pace that we'd need to review.
@9FGSKLL 11mos11MO
No, AI affairs is none of the government's business, but the government can work with AI companies
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.