Try the political quiz

13 Replies

 @9H6DSHVfrom Saskatchewan  disagreed…1yr1Y

Homosexual tendencies have been observed both in current nature and ancient past. Studies have shown that a army consisting of gay couples existed in the 4th century in the Army of Thebes. Almost 10% of rams engage in same-sex sex. Gay marriage and sex isn't unnatural. Morals come down to a person. It isn't up to you to dictate them. Just keep to yourself and have your own opions.

 @9H6DS78from Ontario  disagreed…1yr1Y

I think people should marry who they like, because it’s not our business who they choose to love and they aren’t affecting anyone, I do respect it and they should have rights to do so like straight couples.

 @9H64L5Tfrom British Columbia  disagreed…1yr1Y

There have been gay people for as long as there have been straight people, as far as we can tell. its completely natural. A person is simply a person, no matter who they love. This is an incredibly silly subject and those that want to deny others based on who they love are either scumbags or inc for incredibly misinformed.

 @9H5Z3ZLfrom Ontario  disagreed…1yr1Y

Gay marriage is how humans is a choice. they can adopt a child in need of a home, and so to suggest that homosexuality is your choice.

 @9H5R748from Ontario  disagreed…1yr1Y

Homosexuality has been found in a variety of species in nature, and has been observed across different cultures throughout history. People do not choose who they love. They’re not hurting anyone. Why punish someone for something that is truly good and right? There is also often an increased adoption rate amongst gay couples.

 @9H5LTJGfrom Ontario  disagreed…1yr1Y

Biology in no way influences the morality of a situation. Additionally, there is proof of homosexuality in some species of primates and other humanoids.

 @9H5LGDVfrom Ontario  disagreed…1yr1Y

I think gay marriage should be legalized because people are going to love who they want to love and you can't change that. There are many children in need of adoption that people in a gay marriage could adopt.

 @9H5LBYFfrom Ontario  disagreed…1yr1Y

Everything humans do is unnatural, and the meaning of unnatural cannot reasonably be decided by any religious faith or texts. Unnatural does not equal unethical. Moreover, reproduction is not a moral decision - there is no need to have children, or to not have children, we are not in short supply of them and so sexual actions not resulting in child birth cannot be considered moral or immoral, they simply are as moral or immoral as any other form of sex, planting them firmly in the category of "morally acceptable behavior".

Something cannot be judged to be wrong if there is no harm caused by it - homosexuality, therefor, is a morally neutral activity with no potential for abuse that stems uniquely from homosexuality.

 @9H56BRFfrom Ontario  disagreed…1yr1Y

The subject of gay marriage causes a lot of discourse and chaos in the government and the world. We need to find a way that everyone can agree on to ensure that Canada can make decisions unanimously and as one nation.

 @9H8NG4Yfrom Nova Scotia  disagreed…1yr1Y

Everyone has the right to love who they want to love. Just because they may not be able to conceive a child together, does not mean they can't look into alternative options.

 @9H7P2CMfrom Ontario  disagreed…1yr1Y

You can't choose who you love, and just because the majority of people are straight and it has been like that for a long time doesn't mean same sex marraige should be banned, you would rather somone be miserable than be in a relationship with someone they love?

 @9H7FVS2from Ontario  disagreed…1yr1Y

Even under the very untrue assumption that homosexuality is not natural, much of modern life for humans is unnatural. Is using contraceptives unnatural, because there is no reproduction? Is wearing clothes unnatural, because originally humans did not wear them? Attempting to call something wrong, because it’s not natural is not a very solid connection. I’ll also mention, homosexuality is frequently observed in animals, and has been observed in humans since time immemorial.

 @9H6VWVJfrom Ontario  disagreed…1yr1Y

If that's the case, then heterosexual cisgender individuals who can't reproduce shouldn't be able to get married then. People who don't want kids shouldn't be able to get married then. If you are too old to reproduce, you can not get married a second time then. If your argument is that reproduction can only happen between man and woman, then you are wrong because there are always different circumstances.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this disagreement.

Last activeActivity2 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias63%Audience bias100%Active inPartyConservativeLocationCalgary, AB