The Liberals' inaugural budget contains a $29.4-billion deficit for 2016 which is 10.2% of government spending. Proponents of spending argue that it is a great time for the government is going to borrow money, since interest rates are at 50 year lows. Opponents argue that the spending could get out of control and the debt could easily reach $100 billion a year by 2020.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Show more types:
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
@9HXZTXM1yr1Y
Yes cut spending on certain things like salaries of government officials and increase taxes on large corporations
@9FL7SJ92yrs2Y
I believe they should make cuts to public spending deemed unnecessary by the people and work more on ensuring the national debt is reduced safely without harming the country's economy and its people.
@B46SLTTConservative 4wks4W
Reduce the overall size of government, salaries need to stay competitive to attract competent talent. Able bodied people should need to work for government assistance, by helping to clean up and beautify our communities.
@B3HBCXL2mos2MO
defund the police so more organizations that are in place to help the community can have a further reach
@B3GF4842mos2MO
Reduce the number of government officials and increase taxes for corporations and tax the wealthy more and end tax evasions.
@B3FQ8ZY2mos2MO
Cut the public spending can have devastating consequences. I would prefer that we review all our expenditures and eliminate the ones that are unnecessary and moving forward when we do spend money ensure that we are paying a fair price for the job instead of constantly overpaying and then going over budget With delays
@B3F3VQY2mos2MO
No. Reduce military spending, increase tax on the wealthy and increase taxes on corporations instead
@B3DQ7BN2mos2MO
No, increases taxes on the super rich AND multinational corps, end tax evasion loopholes AND increase funding of the CRA
@B38NWBT2mos2MO
In general, no. But it depends what the cuts are towards... If it's something unecessary, then sure.
@9F73TF8Conservative2yrs2Y
Focus on infrastructure and no LGBTQ communities
This question is too complicated for a simple yes/no answer.
@8VQGW5MNew Democratic4yrs4Y
No, focus on tax evasion, taxing the top of the wealthy and ending the multinational corporation loopholes.
@8V3MGG9New Democratic4yrs4Y
No, increase taxes on large multilational corporations and the wealthy, as well as reduce military spending and end tax evasion.
@B3MY9V31mo1MO
I think if someone is in dept they should pay off their dept, otherwise they might lose stuff lets say...
@B32CB8K2mos2MO
yes but not drastically otherwise we will lose a lot of social programs which are still important to our country
@B2VP3KDNew Democratic2mos2MO
No, reduce tax evasion, higher taxes on the wealthy, reduce benefits and salaries on government officials.
No, focus on tax evasion while increasing taxes on wealthy who are proven to evade. Also focus on spending and what's being wasted
@9ZYVF3M5mos5MO
No, Reduce military spending, increase taxes on wealthy (making over twice the living wage), increase taxes on multinational corporations
@9ZMYJ4P5mos5MO
Just budget more. Instead of spending on the militia, police and other similar services, spent on schooling, healthcare, and tourism. There should be very minimum spending in the immigration sector.
@9YNCRS75mos5MO
Drastically lower wages and benefits of government officials and increase taxes on corporations but don't cut Public spending
@9XQKGCV6mos6MO
We need to very carefully look at what we’re spending money on, especially in terms of what amounts to entertainment. Cultural parades are great, but taxes shouldn’t be funding them.
@9WPHF776mos6MO
I think that the spending has reached a point that it is out of control here in Canada. However, I don't like the idea of necessarily drastically cutting public spending thereby damaging the quality of life for those who need government funded programs and resources. I think there is more of a middle ground based on the question being asked. The national debt is way too high but I wouldn't want to cut costs to necessary programs and things the government spend $ on.
@9W5TSDN6mos6MO
Some argue that targeted cuts to public spending could help reduce the national debt without significantly harming essential services, while others believe that maintaining or increasing public spending is necessary to support economic growth and social welfare.
@9T6K9637mos7MO
They should reduce spending on refugees. Not all refugees are poor, and their financial situation should be regularly assessed. Subsidies should be provided based on their level of wealth.
@9RJ6K3V9mos9MO
No, we should reserve foreign aid spending to budget surplus once all other expenses have been accounted for.
@9RBWNKL9mos9MO
Yes. A serious assessment of necessary programs vs. those intended to address the minor slight of the day is truly needed.
@9R6DM2N9mos9MO
No, focus on ending tax evasion instead and drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials
@9QYGYWZ9mos9MO
Try to end or reduce tax evasion, business exploitation, and make sure large corporations or political parties don’t try to exploit and take advantage of any loopholes.
No, but increase the ultra-rich tax, reduce the unneeded government employees, reduce the pay for government officials, and stop things like giving unnecessary money away.
@9M8CPJ412mos12MO
Yes, decrease the funds we give to special needs workers and peoples. They are less capable than people who are not special needs, making there be no need for the funding we give them.
Yes, but focus on cutting from superfluous initiatives and protect essential services (i.e. healthcare).
@9KZNNL91yr1Y
Yes, increase taxes for a short time and reduce government expenditure, wear ever possible and reduce ministers salaries.
@9K4GN871yr1Y
Make tax dollars used more effectively because a lot of money is wasted in lawsuits due to negligence
@9JWWFBK1yr1Y
The first focus should be to minimize inefficiencies, root out programs not focused critical issues, and manage administrative cost better. Cuts in programs tend to increase issues and cost more in the long run. Taxes may need increasing to provide the most important programs, but efficiency is key
@9GJPKWT1yr1Y
Reform the system to create and motivate an increase in the economy through donations from the rich to offset increasing costs to support a long-term debt reduction strategy.
@9FT9T542yrs2Y
Yes, they should make drastic cuts by increasing efficiency by both cutting government official’s hours and finding ways to create more work for them instead of sitting around as much.
@9FRKFKN2yrs2Y
No, reduce military spending, police budgets, increase taxes on the rich & large multinational corporations instead
@9FG2WHW2yrs2Y
idc nobody cares about national "debt" it aint real cuh
@9FFNPD92yrs2Y
No, they can take cuts in their pay checks.
@9FBHV8C2yrs2Y
No, But focus on ending tax evasion AND focus more on taxing the rich.
@9F2RVFC2yrs2Y
spend on improving our own country
@9F2MK7G2yrs2Y
Yes but only to nonessential services
@9F2MK7G2yrs2Y
Yes but only on nonessential services
@B293PLF3mos3MO
Reduce military spending drastically and reduce benefits and salaries for government officials while also looking for other ways to help reduce wasteful spending.
@B285MVZ4mos4MO
Yes but make moderate cuts where needed based on usage of service. (The lowest used services will be the first to cut when needed)
@9H9QP5V1yr1Y
Again it depends on what they are cutting money for but if a slight cut can make get rid of the country's debt it better now then never rather than the debt growing.
@9FL78TH2yrs2Y
Cut the tax rates and enable people to live comfortably by making things more affordable
@9FGNF9N2yrs2Y
Yes, but not permanently, only until there is no national debt.
@9CYGHXW2yrs2Y
It depends on that they're cutting. Education and healthcare for example, should not be cut.
@9CTN9JGConservative2yrs2Y
No, stop sending money to other nations as pay outs or humanitarian missions
@9BNBM592yrs2Y
No, focus on more important issues like reducing military spending, increasing taxes on the wealthy and reducing the number of government officials instead
@9BM59652yrs2Y
yes, on public with minimum wage.
No, maybe increase taxes for companies; the bigger they are the more they’re taxed.
@966343G3yrs3Y
the government should reduce the public spending on areas that are more unimportant and focus more on very important things like the military so that they can defend our country if needed
@9647RF83yrs3Y
Just not from education and Healthcare
@9645TY33yrs3Y
Yes by cutting UNNECESSARY spending, not vital government services.
@95LL8SV3yrs3Y
Just stop giving away money to other countries who don't even support us.
@959CQ6Z3yrs3Y
I agree with all of these.
@957Q8QX3yrs3Y
stop spending the money on stuff that is not needed like that election half way through the year that cost 600 million
@93QXJCF3yrs3Y
yes but mostly increase taxes on large multinational corporations
We will focus more on removing tax evasion as a problem and the spending on the military.
@93BG3X23yrs3Y
Yes, but only in areas where spending is excessive and ineffective.
@93BF3LL3yrs3Y
@939S32G3yrs3Y
No. National debt isn't a major issue if you understand economics.
@939MJK23yrs3Y
Just don't pay any of your debts you'll die eventually
@936J9Z33yrs3Y
Yes, but increase tax on wealthy, rental properties and freeze wage increases on elected officials. Have all federal incomes be voted on by citizens for elected officials. (PM, MPP, MP, GOV GEN)
@933T6Q93yrs3Y
Yes but by going through each financial records to see where cuts can happen without cutting the services... IE no raises for top management. Cutting 'bonuses or perks" for management.
@92S6KXH3yrs3Y
No, rather halt the continued donation of foreign aid.
@92RTRZZ3yrs3Y
No, reduce government officials, tax the wealthy, increase tax on large multinationals, reduce military spending and drastically reduce benefits and salaries of officials.
Get rid of costly real estate for GoC office space and focus on smaller hoteling workspaces.
all mps ,mpps and the pm should take a fifty percent pay cut and a reduction in perks until the debt is payed off
@8ZYCC8G3yrs3Y
Increase taxes on small things so people don't notice and feel it's small change. Things upto $1000 for example.
All the no, and this is what we should do instead apply.
@8ZSJL5B3yrs3Y
No, increase taxes on the wealthy and all corporations, focus on ending tax evasion and raise the debt ceiling.
@8ZFPZ453yrs3Y
Remove the Catholic School Board funding and reallocate it
@8Z8Z3QW3yrs3Y
Some unneccessary spending
@8Z7DWC93yrs3Y
No, focus on ending tax evasion, increase taxes on the wealthy and corporations.
@8Z47MQG3yrs3Y
@8YZCTTP3yrs3Y
Cut funds of military, focus on tax evasion, tax the rich more.
@8YZ4R3RLibertarian3yrs3Y
No, however we should cease all aide to foreign countries and take care of ourselves first
@8YYPYGX3yrs3Y
Increase taxes on wealthy and multi national corporations and review spending making guaranteed minimum income a reality
@8YYK6BW3yrs3Y
Is there anywhere that the government can afford to cut back on public funding that would not be a detriment to the public? I think not. So what percentage of the wealth is held by what percentage of the people?
@8YHTY4H3yrs3Y
Government should increase the interest rate in banks so that instead of spending money for other sources they should start doing saving with that debts of the will also reduce.
@8Y9NLTQ3yrs3Y
educate and learn about shopping addictions and how to spend wisely
I believe we should cut down certain areas which don't seem too important to the nation in the next three years to pay off the national debt.
@8XZYC7Y3yrs3Y
Yes end wasteful spending
@8XXXYKS3yrs3Y
Only make cuts in inefficiencies
@8XPZKKXNew Democratic3yrs3Y
No, reduce military spending and focus on the taxes of the wealthy as well as corporations
@8XJ8R6V3yrs3Y
No default on the debt and find a new system away from the traditional banks. The bretton woods system falls apart every 50 years
@8XCDZYT3yrs3Y
No, increase taxes on the wealthy and large businesses and increase military spending and focus on ending tax evasion.
@8WZ7BRJ3yrs3Y
No, cuts to public spending will have negative affects, focus more on tax evasions and reducing spending on things that aren't necessary.
We are about to go into an economic crisis. The Government should definitely reduce national debt, but also make an effort to lower tax
@8WTKT243yrs3Y
Yes on whats less essential
@8WL2M2L4yrs4Y
No, increase taxes on large multinational corporations and drastically reduce benefits and salaries of government officials.
Yes but not a lot and then stop after it is ok.
YES! Defund CBC, cut taxes, reduce military spending and foreign aid, increase taxes on large multinational corporation! AND Allow school choice!
@8W5KYMB4yrs4Y
the amount of money we spend isnt your business, pay off canadas debt then dirties
@8W4X69D4yrs4Y
Reduce military spending, end tax evasion and increase 1% taxes
@8VZYFFH4yrs4Y
Increase taxes on the rich, close tax evasion loopholes, and tax large corporations a lot more.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.