Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
@B473MHG3wks3W
yes but not in areas with lots of people, kids ect they should be in the woods out of the city parks
@9RQNPMR9mos9MO
No they should be given the support needed to get healthy and find self worth if not in employment as it doesn't suit everyone then in a community supported role.
@9RCJ67TNew Democratic9mos9MO
How could one possibly know that a homeless individual that is sleeping on public property refused shelter?
@9RBSHFC9mos9MO
No, but an investigation should follow regarding why the individual refused that/those specific shelter/housing option(s)
@9BNW3BK2yrs2Y
Yes, they should be allowed to roam on public property. I think that in addition to this, they should not stop receiving help and be encouraged to accept shelter.
@93C9HD33yrs3Y
No but they shouldnt be punnished either
@8ZVM4P73yrs3Y
Yes but, in designated areas and more social programs aimed at helping them get off the streets.
@9B7SW332yrs2Y
There should be designated safe spaces and non such spaces should be banned.
@99HY5XZ2yrs2Y
If it's someone's house they shouldn't stay on the property unless allowed.
@98MC5YVConservative2yrs2Y
Yes however they can't be interfering with space where people have to walk or get through.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
