Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Show more types:
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
The homeless or those with no housing should be provided with temporary emergency funds, resources for job acceptances or exceptions, including the fact that in regards to housing they should be provided a home that can last them for 5-6 years until they are financially stable. When 5-6 years is up were expected to check on their financial status and situation, and do background checks to ensure their safety, health made will be provided and social programs are restricted meaning the government will take care of their well being for the mean time without restrictive forms. They will immediate… Read more
They shouldnt be allowed however be left with a few warnings and seek mental help and refered to a shelter
I don't think that individuals should be allowed to sleep or encamp on public property, however, I think the regulations and rules of shelter or housing needs to be reevaluated. People often do not want to leave their pets, their drugs if they are addicts, and family members behind (say they are women who can go into a female residential service but cannot bring their partners). Some individuals may be working and cannot attend the shelter at the provided time.
Yes, as long as they're not posing a threat to the general public
Yes, as long as they are respectful and treat the property well (don't vandalize, steal/smash, etc.) because no matter how many houses we build, there is always some people who won't be able to live in them because of underlying circumstances, so giving them access to public washrooms, as well as a space to sleep/eat is in the community's interest for safety of everyone.
Yes, a safe, secure location centralized for homeless encampments supported with health care, food, clothing. And be able to move freely as all citizens can.
Yes. Until will solve the housing crisis.
I think some places could make it a criminal offense, but homeless people should have the option to assisted food, clothing, and healthcare
Yes, because we might not always have the ability to actively be able to care for everyone.
They should create homeless shelters instead.
yes as long as they aren't destroying the property
Yes and no becuase I think that they should be able to encamp where they want, as long as it is not intruding other people. They should not be allowed to encamp on parking lots, or in public parks, but if there is a space for them, not in other peoples way, I find that a bit different.
Yes, encampment should be allowed in designated areas of each city, provided with protection and access to needed resources (food, clothing, and medicine)
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
