Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHAnswersHealthcareStarted 3yrs agoActive 9mos ago

No

5 Replies

 @9JVK6WJfrom Pennsylvania  agreed…9mos9MO

Economic Impact and Productivity Loss: Mandating health passes could have negative economic consequences, particularly for industries that rely on low-wage workers or have high turnover rates. Implementing stringent vaccination requirements may lead to workforce shortages and productivity loss, further exacerbating economic inequalities and hindering recovery efforts.

 @9JM7Q79from Montana  disagreed…10mos10MO

would you want to be around others inflected with a deathly illness and have no protection for yourself and your loved ones I dont really care tbh

 @9GPH998from Alberta  disagreed…1yr1Y

Allowing people to say no to the COVID Vaccine and still work with other people puts a lot of people at unnecessary risk and can even get people sick and killed. The vaccine is not an end-all-be-all to COVID, but it helps with reducing cases and how badly it affects people. The vaccine also makes public areas safer for babies and young kids, the elderly, and the immunocompromised.

 @9FTH64Sfrom Alberta  agreed…1yr1Y

I don't have to, the idea is stupid and only held by radical left morons who have no idea the problems they will have when the holder of office switches and makes their own demands of them that they don't agree with

 @9G6KB5BNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  agreed…1yr1Y

a simple COVID test with make do even if you have the vaccine you can still get COVID for some people COVID could be good because t will boost your immune system but their are a lot of deaths. but it could be better to get it now then later on in life. no one should have to get a vaccine to be able to work their job.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

Active 3hrs ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…15hrs15H

Texas Offers Trump 1,400 Acres for His Mass Deportation Dream

Officials in Texas have offered President-elect Trump a 1,400-acre ranch for his mass deportation plan.Dawn Buckingham, land commissioner of the Texas General Land Office, said in a letter to Trump Tuesday that her office was “fully prepared” to work with federal agencies that are going to be involved in Trump’s immigration plan, and specifically deportation.Buckingham offered Trump a 1,402-acre lot in Starr County. The lot is owned by the Texas General Land Office and is roughly 35 miles west of McAllen, Texas.She said the agency is ready to work with the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or the U.S. Border Patrol to build a facility on the land for “the processing, detention, and coordination of the largest deportation of violent criminals in the nation’s history.”“I am committed to using every available means at my disposal to gain complete operational security of our border,” Buckingham wrote.The letter and offering of land were first reported by The Texas Tribune. Last month, the state bought the land along the U.S.-Mexico border and has plans to build a wall.In the letter, Buckingham criticized her predecessor for not allowing a border wall to be built on the property. Those actions “enabled cartel members and violent criminals to sexually abuse migrant women and children on this land,” she said.On Monday, Trump signaled he would declare an immigration national emergency and use military assets to support his mass deportation plan when he returns to office.

▲  1613 replies

Active 39mins ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…46mins46m

Starmer Throws Netanyahu Under the ICC Bus: UK Backs Arrest Warrant for Israeli PM

Sir Keir Starmer has backed the International Criminal Court (ICC) after it issued an arrest warrant for Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister.When asked about the issue, Sir Keir’s official spokesman said the Government respected the independence of the court.He declined to say whether Mr Netanyahu would be arrested if he arrived in the UK.The spokesman said: “We respect the independence of the ICC, which is the primary institutional institution for investigating and prosecuting the most serious crimes in relation to international law.“This Government has been clear that Israel has a right to defend itself in accordance with international law. There is no moral equivalence between Israel, a democracy and Hamas and Lebanese Hezbollah, which are terror groups.“We remain focused on pushing for an immediate ceasefire to bring an end to the devastating violence in Gaza.”Under the Conservatives, the British government had told the court it intended to challenge the plans for the arrest warrants.However, weeks after coming to power, Sir Keir’s government reversed that position and said it would not object.Downing Street also declined to say whether Mr Netanyahu would be welcome to visit Britain in the future.Sir Keir’s spokesman said: “We never comment on future international visits but my position on the Prime Minister’s support for Israel in terms of its right to defend itself in accordance with international law is very clear.”The spokesman repeatedly declined to “go into hypotheticals” about whether Mr Netanyahu would be arrested if he arrived in the UK.He added: “It’s not up to the Prime Minister to determine other world leaders’ travel schedules. He engages and will continue to engage with the prime minister of Israel in support of Israel’s right to defend itself.”Pressed on what he meant by his comments about the court, the spokesman said: “It means that we respect the independence of the ICC. We respect the fact that the ICC is the primary international institution for investigating and prosecuting the most serious crimes of international concern.”The spokesman went on to say the Government’s “focus” remained an end to the violence in the Middle East, which has been ongoing for more than a year after the Oct 7 terror attacks by Hamas.

▲  117 replies