Should the government subsidize the building of 1.4 million new homes over the next four years?

Yes, and prioritize working families that are low income. Education is expensive, childcare is too and not everyone can afford education which impact ones ability to earn a guaranteed income etc.

We need to redesign zoning codes and build more high density affordable housing and livable spaces, walkable neighborhoods and public transportation. Private homes take too much space and resources.

Prioritize quickly building high density housing first to get people off the streets, already helping lower costs because of lower demand, then build more houses as well as more medium density housing. Change building and zoning laws if necessary.

Yes, but only if the prices of these homes will be through the roof expensive and not at the expense of farmland and green space.

Yes, subsidize and encourage both canadian and foreign construction companies to build more houses

Yes, but not at the expense of farmland and green space as well as only to house the homeless

The government should work to make existing house more accessible by reducing foreign ownership particularly of inner city real-estate, restrict AirBnB and assist first time home buyers.

Yes but not at the expense of farmland and greenspace. AT THE EXPENSE of condo builders and corporations.

Yes but there is many other regulation to fix too

Educate the population to get good jobs.

Yes if people are going to live in them.

Yes, but not at the expense of green space and farmland, and at least part of that housing should work towards reducing homelessness.

Yes, but this should not merely be housing for the poor with only the bare necessities. This should be housing for all who want affordable housing. Canada should adopt a system similar to that in Austria.

If your subsidies mean giving people stuff and not making them work for it. Then no.

doesn’t matter

More subsidized socialize housing for true qualified family

yes, if 1/2 of them fall into "affordable housing" criteria

Not at the expense of losing green space

yes, but in an eco-friendly way

I agree,the housing crisis is surious,but habitat for wild life is important

Houses should be built to fit the demand

Yes & No. The idea is good but what would the established value be & would it undercut the value of the homes for those who are way over leveraged currently

add only the amount that is needed

they should build more homes for homeless people because i bet there is more than 1.4 million homeless people

Only efficient housing for homeless

I would agree as long as they are affordable homes so single parents or single parties can afford.

Build homes for low income individuals

Yes, but for low-income families and with a priority on isolated communities who have inadequate housing

Yes and focus it on affordable housing options for low-middle class citizens.

Yes, 250,000 houses are a better number

For indigenous people, sure

Yes, but better regulation of what type of houses (too many semi-detached houses (with rented basement) being built that are sometimes built with low-quality material, costly and take land from other house types more suitable for those entering the house market)

Maintain the historical properties that exist, there are many empty homes. The problem is affordability.

Yes, as long as they are affordable to lower income families and single people.