In 2017, The Canadian government announced that it would allocate C$40 billion (US$31.6 billion) to a national housing plan to alleviate the severe lack of affordable housing. This includes building 100,000 affordable housing units, repairing another 300,000 social units that already exist and reducing homelessness by 50%.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
Yes, but to house the homeless and not at the expense of farmland and green space
Yes but not at natures expense and scaled down from 1.4m.
Yes, Only for affordable housing on brownfield developments and only to passive house standards.
Housing should be upgraded in city centres, but city limits should not be exceeded.
If it is in areas of high need and will provide affordable housing for the homeless.
Yes, but they should build low income homes, not million-dollar homes.
yes but i belive they should also lower the price to make it more a affordable due to the fact that houses are SOO expensive
Add new house just not to many we still need area for the environment to grow in society
they need to fix up old neighbourhoods befor building new
Only efficient housing for homeless
Yes but only for the homeless and the Canadian soldiers no refugees.
yes and no. building that many houses will be bad for the environment. Yes it would be a good idea if those houses wee going to people without a home.
Depends where, GTA is already over populated
Yes, and some of them should be infills to replace unsafe and inefficient existing homes. And half of them should be reasonably priced rentals, subsidized if necessary.
Upcycle old or unused buildings. Tiny homes
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
