In 2017, The Canadian government announced that it would allocate C$40 billion (US$31.6 billion) to a national housing plan to alleviate the severe lack of affordable housing. This includes building 100,000 affordable housing units, repairing another 300,000 social units that already exist and reducing homelessness by 50%.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
@9RCYQ6B9mos9MO
Only for those who cannot afford a dwelling due to the crazy stupid housing markwt and do not already own property
@9P39F5F10mos10MO
They should build more affordable housing. Not just for homeless people but majority of young people struggle to live in houses
@9F8CVCN2yrs2Y
Subsidize the building of AFFORDABLE homes available only to those below a certain income.
@9BN23J3New Democratic2yrs2Y
No single family dwellings, affordable dense multifamily homes.
@95V2Q8Y3yrs3Y
Yes but there is many other regulation to fix too
@8YB8J6N3yrs3Y
Yes but not at expense of farmland and greenspace and only for those earning below a certain income including the homeless.
@8VSKZ454yrs4Y
Build homes but make them affordable
@8VRZY3V4yrs4Y
Where, for whom, and at what cost to home buyers and tax payers?
@8VRRWV24yrs4Y
There is a cap on how many homes a home owner can own.
@8VP78HL4yrs4Y
Only if the are specifically for low income
Yes, and the government should build more than 1.4 million new units of non-market housing
@8VMDSHCNew Democratic4yrs4Y
Yes, BUT THEY NEED TO BE AFFORDABLE!!!
@8VM7GRMNew Democratic4yrs4Y
Only if it is affordable, public housing.
@8VLLY7S4yrs4Y
Depends where, how, pricing.
@8VLJ4NM4yrs4Y
Yes but only if they're affordable homes
@9BK2KLWNew Democratic2yrs2Y
Repair and rebuild existing houses and properties, make more affordable housing for low-income and homeless people.
@96RDSJSNew Democratic2yrs2Y
I do not support the subsidization of private homes, but rather more midsized rental apartments.
@8ZJNVP53yrs3Y
no reclaim the property of landlords and give it to the people who live there
@8YVCKGD3yrs3Y
Yes but primarily in Indigenous communities/low income
@8VQZJTXNew Democratic4yrs4Y
Maintain the historical properties that exist, there are many empty homes. The problem is affordability.
@8VNQR4J4yrs4Y
Yes, if those houses are reasonably priced for lower income folk
@8VJR5284yrs4Y
Yes but keep the cost low so the new generation can own homes
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
