Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

1.1k Replies

 @9FTY62VCommunistfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

The government should subsided affordable environmentally and economically stable housing. Multiple family residents and apartment based housing. Single family home should be second in line for subsides.

 @92M8FFHfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

Should be a combination of repairing per-existing as well adding new to help limit urban sprawl. Any net new added should be apartment/condo to use new space as efficiently as possible. If the building being repaired falls into the abandoned or condemned category it should be repaired and turned into low income housing to help combat homelessness.

 @8VQ6FVHNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

depends on the population , but building more houses means more jobs options and the list goes on

 @8VNTGWVfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8VNPSTTfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Depends on the area that these homes are built, if it's apart of an area that needs more homes with people who can afford them, houses that won't be bought/ cannot be afforded by the people by annually average, should not be built in-case of money waste.

 @8VNKWGVfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

I believe that the government should build houses according to the percentage of people that are coming into the country and the province.

 @8VHY4MHLiberalfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

i feel like it would deal with the homeless population but we would run out of resources

 @8VKXTJKNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

yes but only for those in poverty that can’t afford big homes or homes without proper assets, like clean water

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...