Hate speech is defined as public speech that expresses hate or encourages violence towards a person or group based on something such as race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Show more types:
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
Province/Territory:
@mrmustacheo5yrs5Y
Yes, but only if those who are exposed to it consent to viewing it
@B3G2PTY2mos2MO
Depends on what is being said. If it is harassment or threatening and isn’t favouring a certain race because of “political correctness”. It needs to be a standard of both sides.
@B4BM96J3wks3W
One should be allowed to say anything no matter how vile, but one should also be aware that saying vile things may entail consequences...
@8W6Q9G94yrs4Y
Somewhat, I know all the hate speech sometimes so STUPID and NON-SCENE, but it's their speech, just let them speak as long as they realize how stupid are they. I don't mind if it threatens violence lol.
@8TWV6HM4yrs4Y
Only if all party's exposed to it have consented first.
@8PY95VJ4yrs4Y
Yes, but only if it is not spread to non-consenting parties.
@mrmustacheo5yrs5Y
Only if those who are exposed to it have consented to doing so
@8XKT3BG3yrs3Y
Yes, hate speech is already protected by the first amendment as long as it does not threaten violence.
@9LCPZKN1yr1Y
Moi je fais confiance au gouvernement.
Et c'est pas logique le nom de People's pour le parti populaire, sa mère a pas choisi un bon nom.
@mrmustacheo5yrs5Y
Only if those who are exposed to it have consented to being so
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
