Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

11 Replies

 @9LXDZSK from Maine  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

Yes. The government CANNOT have the right to infringe on our ability to speak. Unequivocally. No exceptions. No authority figure can be trusted to define hate speech.

 @9KFBDW3Conservativefrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

The boundaries of hate speech are too hard to define broadly so course of action must depend on context.

 @8T3T55PConservativefrom Ontario  commented…4yrs4Y

I think the question is fuzy in that there are law restricting freedom of speech already. Like inciting violence or a call to action are crimes, but hate speech in general is used to restrict freedom of speech by arbitrary calling things hate speech like neo nazis. Either they directly incited violence or it’s free speech. If a nazi want to say stupid things they should be free to even though it’s wrong and stupid obviously

 @OmegaStar713Conservativefrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, because anyone can say something is hateful when taken out of context. Especially atheists towards Christians.

 @97T4JZCConservativefrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech and as long as it does not threaten violence. Free speech is also typically only to protect you from criticizing the government

 @heatherdvdprincessanswered…5yrs5Y

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech, and people say stupid things and shouldn't have the government get involved for it. Encouraging violence should be regulated, but not expressing hate.

 @ambaalamps from Washington  answered…5yrs5Y

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...