The World Health Organization was founded in 1948 and is a specialized agency of the United Nations whose main objective is “the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health.” The organization provides technical assistance to countries, sets international health standards and guidelines, and collects data on global health issues through the World Health Survey. The WHO has led global public health efforts including the development of an Ebola Vaccine and the near-eradication of polio and smallpox. The organization is run by a decision-making body composed…
Read moreNarrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Show more types:
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Ideology:
Province/Territory:
Electoral District (2013):
Electoral District (2011):
@B23CRQ34mos4MO
Yes, but only if they ensure they will be transparent and will not rely on the pharmaceutical complex.
@8VJM5724yrs4Y
Yes, but prioritize national and local programs
@9DYV2PR2yrs2Y
I don't have an idea about this.
@9D536B22yrs2Y
Yes, but also fund national and local programs instead
@8CJHZT25yrs5Y
@9GNXXXT1yr1Y
Yes, as there are other powers such as China and Russia who contribute to it, and we should call for necessary reforms.
@9F928G62yrs2Y
Yes, but proportionately based on our GDP.
@9F5KMPV2yrs2Y
The world health organization is useful for everyone. Every country that should afford it should contribute. Canada can help fund important medical research on the international stage.
@9G397D92yrs2Y
The WHO was founded by the UN and should be funded by the UN as well. Canada should do its relative part.
@9FRKFKN2yrs2Y
Yes but not negatively affecting us and have a system that calculates a fair amount for each country
@9FFPJHK2yrs2Y
Yes, but there needs to be more transparency and oversight
@ECrierie4yrs4Y
No, the World Health Organization has proven to be ineffective and corrupt and is partly responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic.
@8QFCQGTNew Democratic4yrs4Y
Yes, but make it clear that the World Health Organization must be independent and transparent, even if it means causing political issues with some countries.
@8Q6RPFB4yrs4Y
No, until Tedros is no longer the leader.
@8D4X4PW5yrs5Y
No, we should get out, It has proven during this Pandemic to be ineffective, because it took too long for them to declare COVID-19 a Pandemic and we should stop its operations.
@94CXG6G3yrs3Y
No, we should not fund it and abolish it completely.
@93TM7X63yrs3Y
No, it has shown to be inept, ineffective and paid off by big pharma companies to violate the Nuremberg Code and other medical laws.
@936KWVL3yrs3Y
The World Health Organization is little more than a Cummunist Party of China functionaries. It has absolutely no place in any western society
@8ZSJL5B3yrs3Y
@8Y29GSH3yrs3Y
In the interim while we audit and determine where their priorities lie.
@8XCDZYT3yrs3Y
No, it has shown to be ineffective and in cahoots with the Chinese Government. Fund national and local programming instead.
@8W8HT4M4yrs4Y
Yes, but Tedros should resign.
@8W2NLQVNew Democratic4yrs4Y
They were not proactive when Covid-19 broke out, however, Canada should still contribute a little.
@8VTCRZC4yrs4Y
@8VLMFCT4yrs4Y
Yes, but with our deficit repayment dictating how much extra funds can be contributed
@8VJVNDV4yrs4Y
WHO needs to be re-established with better representation from Canada with no self interest by the person appointed.
@8VJM8XW4yrs4Y
No, they are definitely biased and failed us miserably!
@8VJH2554yrs4Y
.. irresponsible spending and corruption
@8VGZQ7W4yrs4Y
No, we need to get away from the global collective good of the UN and WEF and focus on every Canadian
@8VDZRFN4yrs4Y
Yes, maintaining the rate while an investigation into the WHO takes place.
@8VDQNYX4yrs4Y
The world Health organization should fund country's in Need of health care, More wealthy country's should help fund, more funding more benefits for ev
@8VBQJL5Conservative4yrs4Y
Yes, with more accountibility
@8V95QN24yrs4Y
No, it has shown to be ineffective, biased and we should only fund national and local healthcare instead.
@8V5L5V64yrs4Y
yes but to the degree that is beneficial to the organization while not compromising the internal national economy
@8TYQTG54yrs4Y
As long as it supports the growth of other countries less fortunate
@8TXJ32Y4yrs4Y
No because we listen to our own doctors anyways and not the WHO. Why fund something we don’t use the resources for
@8TWYK3L4yrs4Y
Yes, but transparency is important to the people.
The WHO needs to be independently reviewed for clarity, efficacy and consistency - if there is a global standard it should be used solely
@8TNDXCT4yrs4Y
No, fund only Canadian programmes and it has shown to be ineffective.
@8TF629D4yrs4Y
No, abolish the W.H.O. It has shown to be ineffective and in cahoots with other countries. Only fund Canadian programmes instead
@8ST6S8R4yrs4Y
No, not after the covid "pandemic" fiasco. Shame on the WHO, CDC, and Canadian politicians and medical community.
@8SF7HN34yrs4Y
Yes, but put more focus into national and local programs
@8S9KM984yrs4Y
Yes in the interim. However, an investigation needs to be done into the organization once the pandemic subsides to determine their impartiality and see from there whether it is within the best interests of us to keep funding them or instead direct our efforts inwards.
@8RXLK454yrs4Y
Yes, if the money is actually used to help people and not to fund companies
@8RWBHS34yrs4Y
No, it has proven to be ineffective and fund only national/local programmes instead
@shaelynj4yrs4Y
yes, but with regulations and have national and local programs coming first
@8RJ5L744yrs4Y
No, it has shown to be ineffective and in cahoots with China, and we should be only funding Canadian health programming.
@8R26JKW4yrs4Y
No, abolish the W.H.O. it has shown to be biased, ineffective and we should just fund national and local programmes instead.
@8QYWW6Q4yrs4Y
Yes, but work for reform
@8QS8GXG4yrs4Y
WHO has proven itself to be swayed by contributors and become political, ww need to find something better.
@8QMYYKS4yrs4Y
Not until Canada has built its empire
@8PYXCGL4yrs4Y
No, abolish the WHO, it has proven to be ineffective and incompatible and it is a political organization, healthcare organizations should be apolitical and the WHO has introduced harsh, draconian restrictions and rules which have no base ins science.
@8PXK8WV4yrs4Y
No we should leave it has shown to be ineffective
@Waterworks1234yrs4Y
No, they can fund themselves
@8P4P98S4yrs4Y
No, we should fund only Canadian programmes, we should leave the W.H.O. as it is ineffective and they bungled the response to COVID-19.
@8KLHHQY4yrs4Y
No, leave the World Health Organization as it has shown to be ineffective and we should only fund national and local programming.
@8HDGVYC5yrs5Y
No, fund national and local programmes instead and abolish the W.H.O. It is ineffective. Evidence has shown.
@8DGFHHN5yrs5Y
If they Help Palestine and Syria and all arab countries who have been ignored then yes.
@9BVK4972yrs2Y
NO the WHO is fully corrupt and is controlled by private money and interests
@9B7SW332yrs2Y
Only for life saving humanitarian aid. NOT programs that promote preferences
@995WHT52yrs2Y
Yes, but not to the point where it might endanger people who have low income
@98HHR5F2yrs2Y
Yes, but only within reasonable limits.
@942M3263yrs3Y
No, it has shown to be ineffective and paid off by big pharmaceutical companies and only fund national and local programmes.
@8V4VNFV4yrs4Y
No, the World Health Organization is extraordinary corrupt and as a result it's a waste of money.
@8KSCNJ44yrs4Y
I would need more information to answer this question
Yes, and help reform it and make it a better institution as it does have potential.
@98H6TCC2yrs2Y
Yes but with limitations. And also fund national and local programs too
@97WSTML2yrs2Y
Yes but an amount which the country is able to support
@97WDKK82yrs2Y
No, it has shown to be ineffective, fudned by big pharmaceutical companies and we should only fund national and local programmes instead
@97B88MQConservative2yrs2Y
No, Actively Denounce The WHO For The Scam It Is and Fund National and Local Programs Instead
@95GGRLN3yrs3Y
I need to know more information before committing an answer
@8TX57HB4yrs4Y
No, we should have own like Tiawan
@8SHNHYV4yrs4Y
No, it has shown to be ineffective and we should only be funding national and local programming for healthcare instead.
@8HC4N945yrs5Y
In the short term yes. In the long-run, questions need to be answered about the WHO and the political interests of it, and should it be proven to be ineffective, we should look to our allies for collaborative health efforts.
Yes, but with restrictions
Only if it removes bias to China and other high paying parties.
@8RB2K9D4yrs4Y
No, fund national and local programs instead, and leave the United Nations
@8DC736T5yrs5Y
No, it is ineffective and has been proven to be unable to deal with anything, we should abolish the World Health Organization and fund only national and local programmes.
@8D5J4RR4yrs4Y
@88TNS445yrs5Y
No, the WHO has been functioning as a public relations front for the Chinese Communist Party, and the US should sever all ties with the WHO.
@897TFQ94yrs4Y
only relative to the amount that other countries contribute
@8RVPFGJ4yrs4Y
no they need to pay more attention to our country than others.
@DreamBlueonE4yrs4Y
All Government financials need a rehaul and you should a get better Treasury and switch to a blockchain system I created; you need me
@7GQMXLT3yrs3Y
Yes, but only in an amount sufficient to acquire "soft power". Most of our policy making should reside at the state and local levels.
@6Y9S3783yrs3Y
Yes, decrease military spending and use it on WHO and healthcare
@8TCG22H4yrs4Y
I agree and disagree with this.
@6M77WVV3yrs3Y
Fund the WHO, but prioritize local programs
@3PFB9SG4yrs4Y
No, not until Taiwan has an official membership at the WHO
@IINXMP4yrs4Y
@8H4DF7B4yrs4Y
do a study on the effectiveness and also the necessary funding
@895LYM45yrs5Y
Yes, and increase funding for and add national programs as well
@92YHQCV3yrs3Y
Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute unless there's a Pandemic, then we'll increase the amount
@6HDD83R4yrs4Y
Reduce or end funding for as long as non-communist countries continue to have diplomatic relations with China (PRC) (instead of Taiwan (ROC) and recognize it's government as the sole legitimate government government of all China, and allowing people with PRC passports or passports with PRC visas and stamp, to enter the borders of non-communist countries
@6HDD83R4yrs4Y
Drastically reduce or end funding for as long as non-communist countries continue to have diplomatic relations with China (PRC) (instead of Taiwan (ROC) and recognize it's government as the sole legitimate government government of all China, and allowing people with PRC passports or passports with PRC visas and stamp, to enter the borders of non-communist countries
@8LF65LM4yrs4Y
i need to learn more about this topic
@8HJ8G9M4yrs4Y
I am unsure of the whole issue.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
