The World Health Organization was founded in 1948 and is a specialized agency of the United Nations whose main objective is “the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health.” The organization provides technical assistance to countries, sets international health standards and guidelines, and collects data on global health issues through the World Health Survey. The WHO has led global public health efforts including the development of an Ebola Vaccine and the near-eradication of polio and smallpox. The organization is run by a decision-making body composed…
Read moreNarrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Ideology:
Province/Territory:
Electoral District (2013):
Electoral District (2011):
@9DYV2PR2yrs2Y
I don't have an idea about this.
@9F928G62yrs2Y
Yes, but proportionately based on our GDP.
@9FRKFKN2yrs2Y
Yes but not negatively affecting us and have a system that calculates a fair amount for each country
@9FFPJHK2yrs2Y
Yes, but there needs to be more transparency and oversight
@8D4X4PW5yrs5Y
No, we should get out, It has proven during this Pandemic to be ineffective, because it took too long for them to declare COVID-19 a Pandemic and we should stop its operations.
@8ZSJL5B3yrs3Y
@8Y29GSH3yrs3Y
In the interim while we audit and determine where their priorities lie.
@8XCDZYT3yrs3Y
No, it has shown to be ineffective and in cahoots with the Chinese Government. Fund national and local programming instead.
@8W2NLQVNew Democratic4yrs4Y
They were not proactive when Covid-19 broke out, however, Canada should still contribute a little.
@8VTCRZC4yrs4Y
@8VJVNDV4yrs4Y
WHO needs to be re-established with better representation from Canada with no self interest by the person appointed.
@8VJM8XW4yrs4Y
No, they are definitely biased and failed us miserably!
@8VDZRFN4yrs4Y
Yes, maintaining the rate while an investigation into the WHO takes place.
@8V95QN24yrs4Y
No, it has shown to be ineffective, biased and we should only fund national and local healthcare instead.
@8TNDXCT4yrs4Y
No, fund only Canadian programmes and it has shown to be ineffective.
@8TF629D4yrs4Y
No, abolish the W.H.O. It has shown to be ineffective and in cahoots with other countries. Only fund Canadian programmes instead
@8S9KM984yrs4Y
Yes in the interim. However, an investigation needs to be done into the organization once the pandemic subsides to determine their impartiality and see from there whether it is within the best interests of us to keep funding them or instead direct our efforts inwards.
@8RWBHS34yrs4Y
No, it has proven to be ineffective and fund only national/local programmes instead
@8RJ5L744yrs4Y
No, it has shown to be ineffective and in cahoots with China, and we should be only funding Canadian health programming.
@8R26JKW4yrs4Y
No, abolish the W.H.O. it has shown to be biased, ineffective and we should just fund national and local programmes instead.
@8QS8GXG4yrs4Y
WHO has proven itself to be swayed by contributors and become political, ww need to find something better.
@8PYXCGL4yrs4Y
No, abolish the WHO, it has proven to be ineffective and incompatible and it is a political organization, healthcare organizations should be apolitical and the WHO has introduced harsh, draconian restrictions and rules which have no base ins science.
@8PXK8WV4yrs4Y
No we should leave it has shown to be ineffective
@8P4P98S4yrs4Y
No, we should fund only Canadian programmes, we should leave the W.H.O. as it is ineffective and they bungled the response to COVID-19.
@8KLHHQY4yrs4Y
No, leave the World Health Organization as it has shown to be ineffective and we should only fund national and local programming.
@8HDGVYC5yrs5Y
No, fund national and local programmes instead and abolish the W.H.O. It is ineffective. Evidence has shown.
@995WHT52yrs2Y
Yes, but not to the point where it might endanger people who have low income
@98HHR5F2yrs2Y
Yes, but only within reasonable limits.
@98H6TCC2yrs2Y
Yes but with limitations. And also fund national and local programs too
@97WSTML2yrs2Y
Yes but an amount which the country is able to support
@8TX57HB4yrs4Y
No, we should have own like Tiawan
@8SHNHYV4yrs4Y
No, it has shown to be ineffective and we should only be funding national and local programming for healthcare instead.
@8HC4N945yrs5Y
In the short term yes. In the long-run, questions need to be answered about the WHO and the political interests of it, and should it be proven to be ineffective, we should look to our allies for collaborative health efforts.
Yes, but with restrictions
@8DC736T5yrs5Y
No, it is ineffective and has been proven to be unable to deal with anything, we should abolish the World Health Organization and fund only national and local programmes.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
