Try the political quiz
+

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of

Reply

 @9F7FKS6Conservativefrom Alberta  agreed…2yrs2Y

With strict background checks, physiological testing, and training that should be required for gun control, it proves that eligible candidates who have shown their competence to carry a gun will most likely use it in a responsible manner.

 @B3FHVJRfrom Ontario  disagreed…1mo1MO

Training and background checks I agree, but most often we see gun violence committed by criminals in Canada using illegally obtained firearms.

 @B2JKHRWfrom Pennsylvania  disagreed…2mos2MO

I do not have a counter-argument: we do need both background check and safety training for any gun owner

 @9ZVTZM2People’sfrom Newfoundland  disagreed…4mos4MO

While I may be in favor of firearms, I also understand the great weight there is to possession of a firearm. Violent criminals and the mentally unwell must be prevented from obtaining a gun as to prevent harm to others and themselves. This is also why training is important, as those unaware as to how to properly utilize a gun can cause grave harm to themselves, and those in their vicinity. That's why safety, handling, and maintenance training is vital, not just to obtain a gun, but for continual use when in someone's possession, as to keep their knowledge current, and to prevent slack.

 @9ZPXQCSLiberalfrom Quebec  agreed…5mos5MO

Anyone can become a killer with or without a gun, but having easy access to a gun is a dangerous game.

 @9TPQRLVConservativefrom British Columbia  agreed…7mos7MO

With background checks and licensing in place, gun owners who pass said checks demonstrate competency and profiency in using said weapons.

 @9MKBK8SConservativefrom Ontario  disagreed…11mos11MO

We already do have extensive background checks and training in place. PAL holders are continuously background checked even after obtaining their PAL.

 @9HMPBR8from Maine  disagreed…1yr1Y

We already do have fairly strict requirements with our licensing. Licence holders get background checks daily

 @9H2QR8Sfrom British Columbia  disagreed…1yr1Y

I never checked a box for that there should be some training a psychological training for gun owners.

 @9GTQ229from Ontario  disagreed…1yr1Y

There’s already so many restrictions. I am trying to get my licenses and it takes a long long time. It is good to be safe, though it gets to a point where you can do too much. There should still be proper testing though, especially proper training and use. Safety is extremely important.

 @9FKR4R8from Ontario  disagreed…2yrs2Y

No, people should have the right training and a background check (which should be able to be done in the firearms store) in order to buy a firearm.

 @9MBPTTBfrom Ontario  agreed…11mos11MO

Violent crimes involving a firearm in Canada are increasing, a new report by Statistics Canada suggests. According to the agency, there was an 8.9 per cent increase in firearm-related violent crimes(opens in a new tab) per 100,000 people in 2022. (CTV News) This shows that strict background checks are essential as it should not have increased crime rates because of guns on the loose.

 @B29BNRD from Nova Scotia  disagreed…3mos3MO

That was the status quo when I got my firearms license (save the psychological testing). Restricting access after the difficult licensing process is redundant and unnecessary.

 @9GCRH8Zfrom Newfoundland  agreed…1yr1Y

IDK I DONT JUST WANT ANYONE WITH A GUN SOMEONE WHO JUST STROLLED OUT OF THE MENTAL HOSPITAL SORRY I AM SCARED AND DONT WANT CRIMINALS WITH GUNS THANKS OKKK

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...