In October 2019 Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey announced that his social media company would ban all political advertising. He stated that political messages on the platform should reach users through the recommendation of other users – not through paid reach. Proponents argue that social media companies don’t have the tools to stop the spread of false information since their advertising platforms aren’t moderated by human beings. Opponents argue that the ban will disenfranchise candidates and campaigns who rely on social media for grassroots organizing and fundraising.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Province/Territory:
@8VK6Z3M4yrs4Y
Yes unless from candidates themselves
@8SYTJJS4yrs4Y
Social Media companies should allow political advertisement but also institute strict fact checking as well as adopt a no smear campaign policy.
@8QFCQGTNew Democratic4yrs4Y
Yes, but they should promote independent information on parties policy for Canadians to decide who they align with.
@8DQMBG95yrs5Y
No but it should be regulated.
@9BJ887SNew Democratic2yrs2Y
No, but they should ban hate speech and other discriminatory statements that some misconstrue as politics.
@99BWM4Q2yrs2Y
No, but add more restrictions.
@98WXKGQ2yrs2Y
No, however political campaigns that advertise hate speech, human rights violations or calls for violence against minority groups should be censored
@98QNBF4New Democratic2yrs2Y
It should be monitored to ensure only accurate information is being spread, and that it does not result in misinformation and extremism.
@8SFDLS64yrs4Y
Yes, but it should only be banned if they advertise an attack towards an opposing political party or political opponent.
@7PV36BB4yrs4Y
No, but companies should be held liable (through enhanced libel laws) for false advertising
@8WRR7YQ3yrs3Y
Political advertising should be limited to an extent.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
