Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Reply

 @9W4LHPNfrom British Columbia  answered…6mos6MO

Yes, abd the tax should be at least 50% to deter purchasing of Canadian homes by foreign investors. Current foreign investors should be forced to offload ownership of anything over 2 properties. .

 @9FQ5WWFfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

The problem is that the foreign buyers have their PR. They don't show up properly.

 @8QW7HCGfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

stop taxing poor citizens who work hard inforce more taxes on richer people, i dont think that if you make less than 90,000$ a year u should be taxed

 @9ZHRVZKIndependentfrom British Columbia  answered…5mos5MO

The government should impose a tax on all privately-owned land, regardless of whether its owner is foreign or Canadian, and it should be higher than 1%.

 @9WYDMSDfrom British Columbia  answered…5mos5MO

No, but we should have a vacancy tax, if a person or business does not put a building to use, within some amount of time we should slowly impose vacancy taxes and consider seizing the asset for public use.

 @9GNXXXTfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

Depends on what you mean by non-residents, as asylum seekers/refugees, consulates/diplomats and ambassadors, as well as NGOs, and so forth could all be seen as foreign, but provide an important service to this country.

 @96BJF8Nfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and they should mandate that unoccupied domestic properties be made available to rent for reasonable rates.

 @96B4PTJNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

Only if the real estate is unoccupied, and apply the same to residents.

 @969Z7JSLiberalfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, only if they keep the estate vacant, the tax should be at least 10%

 @964SF29Conservativefrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @963W6K9from British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

Add a tax for people who own many homes but only live in one, and attempt to prevent "house flipping" to help reduce real estate prices and make housing more accessible.

 @95YV2DZfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @95WSRRQfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but don't tax those that are permanent residents ect. Have a higher tax for people that are not guarenteed to stay.

 @95K5YQGfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but it should depend on many things. If it's someone who's clearly speculating, and sitting on the property because of it's value, and has no intention of moving to the residence, then they should be subject to the tax, or an even higher tax depending on their income. If it's someone who is a refugee fleeing conflict, a non-permanent resident, someone who has claimed asylum, a foreign diplomat/consulate of another country, or even a international high school/university or college student, they should not be subject to the additional tax, as they have the potential to become citizens, but also can add great value to this country.

 @95JD49Zfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @93BYWPNCommunistfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92Q27N6Greenfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92KQP9Vfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VRR82Cfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8VFMF8Jfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

No foreign ownership unless the owner resides and lives in the home for at least 6 months per year. No foreign corporate ownership of Canadian land.

 @8VBQ62Zfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8VB798Lfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

If the owner is using the real estate as a non family rental the tax should be at least 20%

 @8V8L4X3from British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

No, simply ban all foreign buyers. Foreign individuals and corporations should be banned to buy any residential real estate

 @8V8DS7Rfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Not on resident non Canadians as residents include landed immigrants who are working in and supporting local communities but may not have been here long enough to qualify for citizenship.

 @8V79MYHfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8V6FCJJConservativefrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

No, If housing supply is too low due to non-residents, only citizens can own real estate.

 @8V6C5CNfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8V5DLH6from British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8V4DMJSfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8V45ST4from British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Non residents should not have property in Canada unless they immigrate properly then receive legal citizenship after going through legal channels

 @8V3JNH2from British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8V25LSDfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TYXSVHNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

  @8TXVXMLfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TVXHQWfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TR7LCQfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TNPS7Wfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Maybe. If that non-resident's government taxes Canadians for owning real estate there, then Canada should tax them.

 @8TBDVVPfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

1% is a drop in the bucket to foreigners. And they’ll just find a loophole. Direct our monies to education and healthcare instead of policing foreigners who are in bed with politicians.

 @8T22RJYfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SXVMGMfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Canadian residents should have priority, but other than that, I don't there there should be a tax.

 @8SSLCV2from British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8S8TM97from British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8S5WC53from British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Non Canadian residents for the purpose of investment should be taxed at least 10% and then taxed again if the property sits empty

 @8S53VZLCommunistfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

It depends. This tax could effect immigrants that need housing after fleeing their country.

 @angiepinfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and the tax should be 20%, but only if the real estate is not being rented by full time tenants

 @8RB6PRSfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8R96V9Gfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PY6H54from British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PNFWF2Liberalfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PKQHNCfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PH3JJQNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PGKNZXfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8P939QDfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8P3TN22from British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

No, let's just sit back and watch as foreign investors buy up our entire country and enslave us. It would be an interesting experiment. Oh wait, it's already happening.

 @8NXGKW7from British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8NWCQ2Bfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8NM5K9Hfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8KQX7KBfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

If the house is vacated for a long period of time, then a 10% tax should be imposed. This would help negate money laundering through the housing market, and driving up housing prices.

 @8KKZQKRfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8KJ6B9Nfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8KGXB7Rfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Only those born in Canada, or those who have immigrated and have lived in Canada for 5+ years should be allowed to purchase property.

 @8K9QRN4from British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8K25NPTfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8JRFZTYfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8HZKRVRfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Tax current foreign owners 15% tax on top of property value including taxes. Along with tax corporations or business who own residential properties 15% on yearly property taxes.

 @8HTQ8ZDConservativefrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8HPXJFQfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8H8DY74from British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, infact Canada should be deterring or stopping non-residents frim buying real estate.

 @8GZHG87from British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if it hasn't already. BC now has .5 - 2% speculation tax depending on resident status.

 @8GGZVGJNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

No, the tax should be applied to all properties that are not a primary residence, occupied by individuals for more that 6 months out of the year.

 @8FTG5KJfrom British Columbia  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8DPKRBBfrom British Columbia  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8CLJWCCfrom British Columbia  answered…5yrs5Y

Ban all foreign owned residential housing. Limitations on commercial real estate.

 @8CG3KB5from British Columbia  answered…5yrs5Y

yes, and raise it for those who can easily afford it such as the rich, no for those stuggling financially

 @9D36K4QLiberalfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9BZVR9Yfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

yes but the tax should be much higher and the tax increase dramatically for each of more than one house purchase.

 @9BPFSKJfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9BK2RQ6from British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

Depends on different circumstances. For vacation homes in municipalities/as well as speculators who never move here? Maybe. For diplomats, international students, refugees, NGOs, ambassadors and so forth? No.

 @9B3N2NQfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

Depending on if they are occupying the home or not. If not than taxing the real estate more than 1%

 @98MSVB3Conservativefrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @98FPFSYLiberalfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

Depends on what a "foreigner" is classified as. We can't ban house ownership to refugees, permanent residents, immigrants who are waiting for citizenship, ambassadors, consulates and such, because that would have catastrophic consequences for the country, as well as international relations with other countries. If you mean people who speculate, and don't actually live here, but sit on a property just because it's valuable, then yes, because nobody's living in those houses anyway.
However, there should be consultation with places that have a large amount of vacation homes, nd rely on that for tax money, because they need it for their municipal budgets and it could harm their ability to invest in their community very much.

 @98B4VMHfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

No. Non-residents (unless they are Canadian citizens) should not be able to own residential property in Canada

 @96Z72XKfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

Bar foreign money from our housing market, including investment corporations who create satellite offices here.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...