Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Show more types:

Reply

 @92JXK3J from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

No. It is unconstitutional and expansion and term limits could be corrupted in the future for political purposes.

 @6SGYZ4S from Mississippi  answered…4yrs4Y

Move to a 2/3rds majority confirmation requirement in the Senate for all federal judges, cap the Supreme Court at 9 justices, impose 18-year terms and a rotating term system for Supreme Court justices, and have a commission select a list of potential nominees for the President to select.

 @86N5Z35 from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @86N5Z35 from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @86N5Z35 from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @86N5Z35 from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but also reform how the judges are selected to avoid politicization.

 @8FCV27F from Ohio  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and add an extensive nonpartisan screening process to insure each nominee is qualified and impartial.

 @8LG9WPJ from Maryland  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, in that judges must be shown to be unbiased and apolitical. The judiciary should never be politicized. Judges should have to receive equal represented parties to be confirmed and be fully vetted. Term limits only for mandatory age retirement.

 @thomasjj0 from Georgia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @ThomasJ476 from Georgia  answered…3yrs3Y