Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Show more types:
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
Electoral District (2011):
Electoral District (2013):
@9MGN56611mos11MO
I think they should only use animals that are suffering of a disease and will soon die but if they require a healthy animal then the use of healthy animals should be limited.
@95PJ28K3yrs3Y
yes but not for cosmetics or drugs
@8X8B6QX3yrs3Y
Yes but not for cosmetics and not in a way that makes the animal suffer
@8X452LT3yrs3Y
NO! animals have feelings and feel pain, we don't have the right to violate them simply for ourselves
@8VBZ72J4yrs4Y
Yes but as long as it is done humanely.
@8T2VSQB4yrs4Y
Only rats, nothing else.
@8QBGVBS4yrs4Y
As long as it could also benefit them.
@8NZWYH64yrs4Y
Yes as long as they are not endangered animals.
@8DGG8CH5yrs5Y
Yes depending on the intelligence. Something like mice is fine but something like a cat or dog is completely unacceptable
@8CTCX4KConservative5yrs5Y
No, citizens should have the right to apply to test for the safety of drugs, vaccines, medical devices, and cosmetics with payment.
@98V6HLLNew Democratic2yrs2Y
No, animal testing is cruel and no longer necessary for the majority of things other than medicine; and we should find an alternative
@8HZP93DConservative5yrs5Y
Yes, but only when all regulations are met and animal welfare is maximized.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
