Should researchers be allowed to use animals in testing the safety of drugs, vaccines, medical devices, and cosmetics?

Yes, only of it is ethical and does not harm the animal

it depends on the types of products being used. if it is likely to harmfully affect the animal, it should not be allowed

No, such test should be on volunteers and maybe people on death row depending on what they did and what tests but this is something I am somewhat unsure of

No, do the testing on people in jail instead. Why not test on an actual human that’s in jail for the rest of their lives.

Yes but not for cosmetics, and it should be made illegal out as soon as an alternative viable method becomes available (regardless on any increased cost to R&D)

If there is no other method to ensure safety and the animals are treated as humanely as possible then I would believe it to be a necessary evil, Cosmetics are a definitive no, as well as any drugs not primarily to improve quality of life for people and/or animals.

Only if absolutely necessary and the animals are treated with respect but dont allow for cosmetics

Yes, but only for things that are necessary to our lives, like vaccines, but not anything connected to cosmetics.

No, humans that have committed heinous crimes and have no chance of returning to society should have these tested on them.

With proper ethical oversight

no that is cruel.

Yes, but only once adequate testing has already been completed and not for cosmetics

Yes, but only if they are capitolist pigs

As long as the animal isn't abused

only if its on certain animals like rodents

Yes, but only animals that there are too much of, like rats

yes but mice and rats only. Not rabbits or dogs ever.

test on criminals in prison serving life or convinvicted of murder, violence against women/children/animals, and fraud related crimes

Yes, for necessary medicine

For cosmetics , not for vaccines and pharma

No. Let’s start testing on hard core criminals.

Greatly Depends on the animals used,the procedures and processes,the necessity of the testing etc.

Yes, but only if there is no alternative

No it hurts animals

Yes, but not for cosmetics and only to be tested on rodents

Yes, but not for cosmetics and only certain types of animals with less cognizance and awareness and if they are treated humanely and enjoy the same benefits as a person would during human testing

depending on the severity on the drugs and the “expected/known” effects as along as it’s not extreme

Non-domesticated animals such as mice and rats.

Yes, but only for certain testing. Only where testing is for something where the animal's life isn't thought to be at risk.

Yes, but only with scientific backing

Yes, but only after extensive tests have been done to reduce the risk of harm to animal test subjects.

No, test on Pedophiles, Rapists, Murderers, Treasonous Politicians, and globalists.

It needs to be dependent on case by case basis.

Use rapists and abusers instead.

Yes, but only with very strict ethical standards

only if absolutely necessary and never for cosmetics

Such testing is inhumane on primates, given their complex intelligence and social needs. Domestic dogs and cats as well. Test it on farm animals who are already an exploited resource for food and other products, as well as rodents.

No, use death row/life sentence inmates instead

Only for sick animals can medicine be tested

Yes, if we don't use animals how are we going to advanced these things. Just please do it humanely.

No, unless the animal is unharmed

It depends on what animals are being used for testing in situations for drugs, vaccines, and medical devices, but they should never use them to test cosmetics.