Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
Electoral District (2011):
Electoral District (2013):
@9JWQKH81yr1Y
I agree there should be a boundary here of some sort cause of the organs. yet again the animal cruelty so depends I guess
@9KDYD2W1yr1Y
Use proven criminals, convicted of violent crimes, who are in prison for 10+ years (or a life sentence)
@92VCKC2Conservative3yrs3Y
if they have no other option and there's still many of that species
@8ZTMNF73yrs3Y
I am quite conflicted on this question. Definitely not for cosmetics
@8VKKXXL4yrs4Y
No save the animals ... use liberlas instead
@8V3LJZHNew Democratic4yrs4Y
Yes, but in a safe and controlled environment with veterinary staff on hand, with minimal harm or stress to the animal
@8TWKYN54yrs4Y
Yes. For life saving applications only
@99WWQM42yrs2Y
Yes but only if the animal is old and is going to die soon and does not belong to some one.
Yes, with strict regulations for ethical testing but not for cosmetics
@98CR9LR2yrs2Y
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
