Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
Electoral District (2011):
Electoral District (2013):
@B4BM96J3wks3W
When there are no other viable options and the drug/vaccine/device has life-saving value. NOT FOR COSMETICS!!!
@B2QNMXZ3mos3MO
Yes, but as a last-resort ONLY and should follow the same guidelines as testing on human - It should be done ethically and devoid of any form of cruelty.
@9JZP7TY1yr1Y
testing on animals should be avoided and only to be done in very restricted circumstances such as in medical safety only and restricted to only certain animals like mice and rats.
@8VTP6H34yrs4Y
no - use pedophiles and sex offenders for testing
@8V2X3T34yrs4Y
there are prisons full of pedophiles and rapists for this
@8TN4GLW4yrs4Y
Yes, and with no or minimal government regulation.
@8JGJZQF4yrs4Y
Yes, but not for animals that qualify as household pets.
@8DHZYSJLibertarian5yrs5Y
Yes but just some animals like hamsters, or animals that we always see in experiments.
@98HTVGS2yrs2Y
Yes, as long as the animals are treated with respect
@96GC756New Democratic3yrs3Y
Yes, but not for cosmetics and ethically
@8D7LSPX5yrs5Y
Not for human satisfaction (cosmetics)but for human needs such as vaccines, diseases, etc.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
