Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
Electoral District (2011):
Electoral District (2013):
@96KSTFXConservative3yrs3Y
Yes, if it’s beneficial for research purposes and if they’re doing early testing on animals that are considered pests
No, use pedophiles, rapists, and murderers
@92VCKC2Conservative3yrs3Y
if they have no other option and there's still many of that species
@8VN3SPMConservative4yrs4Y
Yes, as long as it is as painless as possible for the animals and serve a greater good for humanity .
@8VJ6J92Conservative4yrs4Y
The only animals that should ever be exposed to these things are mice and rats as they are extremely numerous and an overall pest.
@8KNNZN6Conservative4yrs4Y
Yes, but only for animals with violent history.
@8CTCX4KConservative5yrs5Y
No, citizens should have the right to apply to test for the safety of drugs, vaccines, medical devices, and cosmetics with payment.
@9228GBBConservative3yrs3Y
Yes but not on household pet’s
@8HZP93DConservative5yrs5Y
Yes, but only when all regulations are met and animal welfare is maximized.
@8GJ55J3Conservative5yrs5Y
Yes, as long as proper safety measures are taken to ensure the animal is not being abused by researchers outside of testing.
@8XQCYHB3yrs3Y
only on some kinds/breeds of animals
@7GP32QV4yrs4Y
No, animals have the God-given right to live their lives to the fullest
@8CNT65N5yrs5Y
Animals should not be the first option, but if it is the only option than possibly.
@8WRGD393yrs3Y
No beause animals have all kinds of different immunities and stuff.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
