Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
Electoral District (2011):
Electoral District (2013):
@96KSTFXConservative3yrs3Y
Yes, if it’s beneficial for research purposes and if they’re doing early testing on animals that are considered pests
@92VCKC2Conservative3yrs3Y
if they have no other option and there's still many of that species
@8VN3SPMConservative4yrs4Y
Yes, as long as it is as painless as possible for the animals and serve a greater good for humanity .
@8VJ6J92Conservative4yrs4Y
The only animals that should ever be exposed to these things are mice and rats as they are extremely numerous and an overall pest.
@8KNNZN6Conservative4yrs4Y
Yes, but only for animals with violent history.
@8CTCX4KConservative5yrs5Y
No, citizens should have the right to apply to test for the safety of drugs, vaccines, medical devices, and cosmetics with payment.
@9228GBBConservative3yrs3Y
Yes but not on household pet’s
@8HZP93DConservative5yrs5Y
Yes, but only when all regulations are met and animal welfare is maximized.
@8GJ55J3Conservative5yrs5Y
Yes, as long as proper safety measures are taken to ensure the animal is not being abused by researchers outside of testing.
@8WRGD393yrs3Y
No beause animals have all kinds of different immunities and stuff.
@7GP32QV4yrs4Y
No, animals have the God-given right to live their lives to the fullest
@8CNT65N5yrs5Y
Animals should not be the first option, but if it is the only option than possibly.
@8XQCYHB3yrs3Y
only on some kinds/breeds of animals
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
