Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
Electoral District (2011):
Electoral District (2013):
@8VL9NFX4yrs4Y
Only for life-saving drugs or drugs that will greatly reduce suffering. And if a legal standard is put in place to protect the animals and retire them early into a rehab program.
yes, but only if urgent and never for cosmetics ever.
@8V5Z6RL4yrs4Y
only if absolutely necessary for important MEDICAL advancements, NOT cosmetics
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but not for cosmetics and only on mice or various rodent types of animal species
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but not for cosmetics and only on mice or rodent animal species
@8QDSNZY4yrs4Y
It depends if the animal can feel the pain or be killed in the process, If the animal dies will it be a quick death. However, animals should never be tested with cosmetics.
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but only on mice or rodent animal species and not for cosmetics
@842VWLK3yrs3Y
no, but allow it if one, it has a low risk of greatly harming the animal, and two, the medical device/vaccine will save millions of lives, wipe out a virus, and/or is groundbreaking. ban cosmetic testing on animals altogether.
@8QDSNZY4yrs4Y
It depends if the animal can feel the pain or be killed in the process however animals should never be tested with cosmetics.
@842VWLK3yrs3Y
yes, but only if one, it has a low risk of greatly harming the animal, and two, the medical device/vaccine will save millions of lives, wipe out a virus, and/or is groundbreaking. ban cosmetic testing on animals altogether.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
